Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:48 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Bug 13658
>
>
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>
> >
> > I think it is perfectly fine for Coyote to require Java2.
> >
> > HashMap is available in GCJ/Kaffe and AFAIK in J2M
Bill Barker wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 12:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Bug 13658
>
>
>> Bill Barke
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat"
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: Bug 13658
>Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
>>Before I start performing major surgery on the TC4/5 connector, I
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: Bug 13658
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > Before I start performing major surg
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: Bug 13658
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> >
Bill Barker wrote:
Before I start performing major surgery on the TC4/5 connector, I
wanted to
check on what is the reason for having the attributes field in
CoyoteRequest
(instead of just delegating to the o.a.c.Request like the 3.3 Adapter
does).
At the moment, the SSL request attributes a