> Thanks to George C. Hawkins for clearing up the
> specification and to Pier Fumagalli for correcting the
> spelling of my last name.
Oops sorry about the misspelling - it genuinely wasn't intentional - Freudian
slip maybe :-) Sorry if my first e-mail was a bit dogmatic.
> It is now clear that
ote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, George C. Hawkins wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:52:32 +0100
> > From: George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, George C. Hawkins wrote:
> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:52:32 +0100
> From: George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT
"George C. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's "patch" should be applied. As has been
> pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for
> the JSP and servlet JCRs.
Robert LUCIER... There's no "F" between the "I" and the "E"... He's not an
I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's "patch" should be applied. As has been
pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for
the JSP and servlet JCRs.
In the Servlet 2.3 PFD2 specification you find the following in the
definition of parseQueryString():
"The query string shoul
