Gary Benson wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>> My benchmarks ( > 1 yr ago ) showed GCJ-based tomcat to be as fast
>> as the IBM JDK1.3 ( the fastest VM at that time ). There were small
>> differences under different loads - but the garbage collector seemed
>> like the biggest factor ( GCJ perform
Costin Manolache wrote:
> My benchmarks ( > 1 yr ago ) showed GCJ-based tomcat to be as fast
> as the IBM JDK1.3 ( the fastest VM at that time ). There were small
> differences under different loads - but the garbage collector seemed
> like the biggest factor ( GCJ performed worse on JSP pages wher
Gary Benson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on building Tomcat and its dependencies to native
> code with gcj, and I'm interested to see how it compares against
> Tomcat running under a 'normal' JVM. Now, I'm well aware that
> benchmarks are not a real-world indicator of performance, but
Sadly it doesn't do any JITting. I recommend writing a custom
classloader that Runtime.exec()'s gcj to compile the webapp into a
.so, and then dlopen() that.
- a
Gary Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chad Johnson wrote:
> > I can't help with the benchmark software but I've got a question
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Benchmarking gcj-built Tomcat
As far as I know, it's just an interpreter, but I may be wrong.
However, any calls to native-code stuff will execute as native code so
it's perhaps not quite as bad as it may s
Chad Johnson wrote:
> I can't help with the benchmark software but I've got a question for
> you. Generally speaking, how well does the gcj bytecode interpreter
> perform? Is it purely and interpreter or does it do some jit'ing?
As far as I know, it's just an interpreter, but I may be wrong.
How
Gary,
I can't help with the benchmark software but I've got a question for
you. Generally speaking, how well does the gcj bytecode interpreter
perform? Is it purely and interpreter or does it do some jit'ing?
Chad Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Gary Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
