on 1/12/01 11:52 PM, "David Weinrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In diving through the documentation I found for log4j, and hitting the
> website I noticed...it is now part of the jakarta project (yay!). Seems like
> this would be a (much much much) better idea than my mostly-untested syslog
>
David Weinrich wrote:
> In diving through the documentation I found for log4j, and hitting the
> website I noticed...it is now part of the jakarta project (yay!). Seems like
> this would be a (much much much) better idea than my mostly-untested syslog
> code for an addition to the logger classes,
In diving through the documentation I found for log4j, and hitting the
website I noticed...it is now part of the jakarta project (yay!). Seems like
this would be a (much much much) better idea than my mostly-untested syslog
code for an addition to the logger classes, any thoughts on this?
David W
