Re: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 7 May 2001, Nick Holloway wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig R. McClanahan) writes: > > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Marc Saegesser wrote: > > > According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() > > > > > > Returns the fully qualified name of the client that sent the request, or the > > > I

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Marc Saegesser
he current implementation is no more broken then the previous one. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 4:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: About bug#208 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig R. McC

Re: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Nick Holloway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig R. McClanahan) writes: > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Marc Saegesser wrote: > > According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() > > > > Returns the fully qualified name of the client that sent the request, or the > > IP address of the client if the name cannot be deter

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>The previous behavior violated the spec and therefore had to be changed >prior to releasing 3.2.2. Right now I can live with a simple solution. And you fix it. >I'm waiting to hear back from a user to make sure that the >last change for >JDK 1.1 support fixed his problem and then I plan to ca

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Marc Saegesser
GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 4:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: About bug#208 > > > >I just commited the fix for 3.2.2. > > Not really. > > When the hostname is null or missing, you copy the host IP > adress, but

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Z Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:16 AM >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: RE: About bug#208 >>> >>> >>> >According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() >>> > >>> >Returns

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:16 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: About bug#208 >> >> >> >According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() >> > >> >Returns the fully qualified name of the client tha

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() >> >> Returns the fully qualified name of the client that sent the >request, or the >> IP address of the client if the name cannot be determined. For HTTP >> servlets, same as the value of the CGI variable REMOTE_HOST. >> >> Based o

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Marc Saegesser
I just commited the fix for 3.2.2. > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: About bug#208 > > > >According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() > >Returns the fully qualified name of the client that sent the >request, or the >IP address of the client if the name cannot be determined. For HTTP >servlets, same as the value of the CGI variable REMOTE_HOST. > >Based on that I would

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Marc Saegesser wrote: > According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() > > Returns the fully qualified name of the client that sent the request, or the > IP address of the client if the name cannot be determined. For HTTP > servlets, same as the value of the CG

RE: About bug#208

2001-05-07 Thread Marc Saegesser
According to the JavaDoc for ServletRequest.getRemoteHost() Returns the fully qualified name of the client that sent the request, or the IP address of the client if the name cannot be determined. For HTTP servlets, same as the value of the CGI variable REMOTE_HOST. Based on that I would say that