Costin Manolache wrote:
Something like that was discussed on commons ( I think ).
The problem seems to be that different regex packages use
different rules ( Perl-like, etc ), there is not standard
syntax for regexp.
That means the behavior would be dependent on which regexp
engine is used.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez
> >
> > I would rather pick one and use it, and deal with the build
> problems.
> > Probably we should just use what apache uses, it seems like
> a reusable
> > piece of code.
> >
> > Other opinions ?
>
> We should use a regexp implementatio
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Henri Gomez
>> >
>> > I would rather pick one and use it, and deal with the build
>> problems.
>> > Probably we should just use what apache uses, it seems like
>> a reusable
>> > piece of code.
>> >
>> > Other opinions ?
>>
>> We s
Something like that was discussed on commons ( I think ).
The problem seems to be that different regex packages use
different rules ( Perl-like, etc ), there is not standard
syntax for regexp.
That means the behavior would be dependent on which regexp
engine is used.
I would rather pick one an