As promised, I've just checked this in. I've modified the original patch
slightly so that the configuration can be set as options to
Servlet22Interceptor. I've also added an option to disable pooling so that
we don't get flooded with "why doesn't my CounterServlet work anymore"
messages. Hopefu
I've looked at it, and will check it in after 3.3 goes final.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SingleThreadModel Pool for TC 3.3
> Thanks David.
>
> I don'
Thanks David.
I don't like STM, but since it's part of the spec we need to support it.
And since you spent the time to write it, I think we have the duty to
check it and find a way to check it in:-). Unfortunately,
not for 3.3, it's too late. But 3.3.1 can include it.
Costin
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001
"Schreibman, David" wrote:
>
> I'm submitting this with mixed feelings since the recent discussion has
> shown strong opinions about the utility of the SingleThreadModel.
STM as a concept has so many flaws that I tend to side with Jon (ie. it
should be dropped from the spec). Personally, I was d
