Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk
>
>
>Here's with jk_pool_strdup (against RC1, not HEAD). It looked
>to me like
>uw_map->p wasn'
I was afraid of that... guess os memory allocation it is, then.
Keith
| It looked to me like
| uw_map->p wasn't suitable for per-request allocations (i.e. it would just
| eat memory until the server was re-started), and since this is in common, I
| couldn't use ap_strdup since that breaks all no
non-Apache servers.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Wannamaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:25 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk
> Hi Bill, would you resubmit a patch that makes use of e
Hi Bill, would you resubmit a patch that makes use of either
Apache or jk's pools? ie ap_strdup or jk_pool_strdup.
That would be a better way to solve the problem. Apache
modules should and do avoid os memory-allocation routines
like the plague. I think uw_map->p would be ok, but please
do some
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
>
> > I think we need Bill Barker & Kin-Man Chung aboard already.. if we dont
> > want to have more work that we already have integrating their patches..
> >
> > Next can change subject and call this a vote about givi
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> I think we need Bill Barker & Kin-Man Chung aboard already.. if we dont
> want to have more work that we already have integrating their patches..
>
> Next can change subject and call this a vote about giving them committer
> access ASAP :)
+1 :-)
I think we need Bill Barker & Kin-Man Chung aboard already.. if we dont
want to have more work that we already have integrating their patches..
Next can change subject and call this a vote about giving them committer
access ASAP :)
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original-
> De:
