Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes

2002-01-17 Thread costinm
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tom Drake wrote: > Costin: > > I'm not sure where to make these changes. In particular, I don't > know to which message(s) the jvmRoute information is attached > or how to extract it from the payload. The route is attached on each request. It could be sent only when the conn

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes

2002-01-17 Thread Tom Drake
Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:45 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes | | | On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:51:02 -0800 (PST) | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > Reply-To: Tomcat

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes

2002-01-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:51:02 -0800 (PST) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes &g

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes

2002-01-15 Thread costinm
Hi Tom, Sorry for the late response, I didn't have email last few days. The patch is perfect, I hope Remy will be able to incorporate it in 4.0.2. One extra thing we could try is to look in the jk connector and see if it's possible to set the engine - we have access to the Request and Container

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments

2002-01-15 Thread Tom Drake
cat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:08 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments | > Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from | > misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ? | > for example just th

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments

2002-01-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from > > misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ? > > for example just the server hostname or ip address ? > > > > Adding the hostname/adress should be fine for the majority of case > > where only one JVM

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments

2002-01-15 Thread Remy Maucherat
> Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from > misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ? > for example just the server hostname or ip address ? > > Adding the hostname/adress should be fine for the majority of case > where only one JVM will be make run TC 4.x by system. >

RE: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments

2002-01-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ? for example just the server hostname or ip address ? Adding the hostname/adress should be fine for the majority of case where only one JVM will be make run TC 4.x by system. Or may be

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes

2002-01-14 Thread Daniel Rall
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey Tom, when sending patches inline, you need to instruct your email > client to not line wrap at 76 columns (what's good for the humans > isn't good for the machines :-). Look like you already noticed. :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes

2002-01-14 Thread Daniel Rall
Hey Tom, when sending patches inline, you need to instruct your email client to not line wrap at 76 columns (what's good for the humans isn't good for the machines :-). Dan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments

2002-01-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Tom Drake wrote: > > Costin: > > I noticed that my patch email got line-wrapped. So, I'm sending them as an > attachment. Yep, I like the patch ;-) > > Tom > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL P