Re: [5.0] Refactoring Bootstrap and BootstrapService

2002-11-08 Thread Endre Stølsvik
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: | ... as well as the Catalina and CatalinaService classes. The idea is to | remove the *Service, and have only one set of classes (which would still | handle all use cases). There has been a number of random method | additions which make the whole thing a

Re: [5.0] Refactoring Bootstrap and BootstrapService

2002-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > >> It was about time ! >> >> I suppose we'll end up with Bootstrap + Catalina. >> What I would like is to have a similar bean/ant-like interface >> on both ( i.e. setter methods for all options configurable on >> command line + execute() pattern )

Re: [5.0] Refactoring Bootstrap and BootstrapService

2002-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
It was about time ! I suppose we'll end up with Bootstrap + Catalina. What I would like is to have a similar bean/ant-like interface on both ( i.e. setter methods for all options configurable on command line + execute() pattern ). With the main distinction beeing that Bootstrap will be a class w

Re: [5.0] Refactoring Bootstrap and BootstrapService

2002-10-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: It was about time ! I suppose we'll end up with Bootstrap + Catalina. What I would like is to have a similar bean/ant-like interface on both ( i.e. setter methods for all options configurable on command line + execute() pattern ). With the main distinction beeing that Bo