Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

> > [ ] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [X] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > Actually, more like 0.4, since I'll help with ApacheConfig etc. > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-m

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

> > [X] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [ ] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > > --Manveen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

+1 Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose to release the current code in the 4.0 branch as Tomcat > 4.0.2 Final. > This release includes lots of bugfixes and improvements, especially in the > connectors area, which feature a dramatic improvement over what was > available in Tom

RE: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

>The build doesn't require that, unless you use the "full.dist" >option (which >forces building everything, to prevent the release manager >from releasing >incomplete builds ;-)). > >JNDI is the only API you mentioned that is required (but it's >included in >JDK 1.3+, and you dont need the JAR)

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

> I miss the discussion of yesterday, sorry. > Did it means that the build won't require jndi/jdbcext/javamail/jaf > that caused me so many headaches in RPM packaging ? The build doesn't require that, unless you use the "full.dist" option (which forces building everything, to prevent the release

RE: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

>As discussed yesterday, the binaries will include a minimal >distribution >designed to be run on JDK 1.4. I miss the discussion of yesterday, sorry. Did it means that the build won't require jndi/jdbcext/javamail/jaf that caused me so many headaches in RPM packaging ? > >[ ] +1 - I support thi

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

[X] +1 - I support this release and I will help [ ] +0 - I support this release [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: Patrick Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to propose to release the current code in the 4.0 branch as Tomcat > 4.0.2 Final. > This release includes lots of

RE: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

> > [ ] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [X] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

[X] +1 - I support this release and I will help [ ] +0 - I support this release [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: I'll build NetWare mod_jk connectors. Mike Anderson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > [X] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [ ] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > > > I'll help more on the connector side, of course ( so it's +0.6 ). Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > [X] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [ ] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

on 2/8/02 10:32 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ ] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [X] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail

RE: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

+0 actually, +0.5 -- i'll help out if i can :) > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release > > > Hi, > > I'd like to propose to release the current cod