Re: Tomcat 5 Redhat Fedora rpm question

Yep, for all Java RPM based stuff, jpackage.org is your friend :) 2005/6/1, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > JPackage: http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=1901. > > Yoav > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > &

RE: Tomcat 5 Redhat Fedora rpm question

Hi, JPackage: http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=1901. Yoav > -Original Message- > From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:46 AM > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Tomcat 5 Redhat Fedora rpm question > > Hi, &g

Tomcat 5 Redhat Fedora rpm question

Hi, I am interested in packaging Tomcat. So I found (using rpmseek.com) the following files: tomcat5-5.0.30-5jpp_6fc.i386.rpm tomcat5-5.0.30-5jpp_4fc.src.rpm At a first glance, these files looked like what I wanted to create, but they contain much more than what I expected and I need to learn

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/build/rpm tcnative.spec.in

mturk 2005/01/16 23:17:06 Modified:jni/native Makefile.in build.conf libtcnative.dsp libtcnative.dsw tcnative.dsp jni/native/build/rpm tcnative.spec.in Log: Update build files. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +3 -5 jakarta

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/build/rpm tcnative.spec.in

mturk 2005/01/14 05:46:44 Added: jni/native/build/rpm tcnative.spec.in Log: Initial upload Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/build/rpm/tcnative.spec.in Index: tcnative.spec.in

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/build/rpm - New directory

mturk 2005/01/14 05:46:14 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/build/rpm - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

jean-frederic clere wrote: I am building a rpm of Tomcat for one of FSC product (OpenIS). It installs Tomcat in /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-${VERSION} and /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat or /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat5. It uses jsvc (for common-daemon) to start/stop the Tomcat. I was planning to

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manage to get it working on windows with cygwyn's RPM - can we have it included in future releases ? It's using /opt prefix - I can switch to /usr/local ( as apache httpd default ). Preferences ? I am building a rpm of Tomcat for one of FSC product (Op

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

5.0 - and manage to get it working on windows with cygwyn's RPM - can we have it included in future releases ? It's using /opt prefix - I can switch to /usr/local ( as apache httpd default ). Preferences ? I am building a rpm of Tomcat for one of FSC product (OpenIS). It installs Tom

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

orking on windows with cygwyn's RPM - can we have it included in future releases ? It's using /opt prefix - I can switch to /usr/local ( as apache httpd default ). Preferences ? I am building a rpm of Tomcat for one of FSC product (OpenIS). It installs Tomcat in /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-to

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

0 - and manage to get it working on windows with cygwyn's RPM - can we have it included in future releases ? Seems good to me. It's using /opt prefix - I can switch to /usr/local ( as apache httpd default ). Preferences ? I also found "epm" - a tool that generates RPM,

RPM spec file using our layout

It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ). http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup If I update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manage to get it working on windows with cyg

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8154] - logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8154 logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-07 10:02 --- Take a look at JPackage Project, www.jpackage.org, where rpms for majors java products, including the one from ASF, are now

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8154] - logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8154 logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5952] - Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5952 Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21105] - Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21105 Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Additional Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21105] - Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21105 Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8155] - Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8155 Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8155] - Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8155 Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-29 09:31 --- You should consider using the RPM provided by JPackage projet (www.jpackage.org). -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21105] New: - Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21105 Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d Summary: Tomcat RPM: /etc/profile.d Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Com

RPM builds

I apologize if this is obvious, it's my second day on the list and the mailing list archive gives me an internal error. I was wondering if someone could tell me who builds the binary (rpm) releases for tomcat? I would like to get in touch with the packager. Best regards, Wayne Chang Pa

Tomcat 4.1.18 rpm available

After some delay the TC 4.1.18 rpms are available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.18/rpms/ Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5952] - Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5952 Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14021] - Default RPM install fails WAR autodeploy due to directory permissions

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14021 Default RPM install fails WAR autodeploy due to directory permissions [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14021] New: - Default RPM install fails WAR autodeploy due to directory permissions

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14021 Default RPM install fails WAR autodeploy due to directory permissions Summary: Default RPM install fails WAR autodeploy due to directory permissions Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.1.12 Platform: All OS/V

Tomcat 4.1.12 rpm release 2 uploaded

A quick note to warn rpms users that rpm release 2 of tomcat 4.1.12 has been released and fix : - fix tomcat4.conf to use /etc/java/java.conf - fix tomcat4 initd to be sure that we'll stop/start the task owner by TOMCAT_USER and running catalina - fix perms on /etc/tomcat4, contents is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8107] - uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107 uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8107] - uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107 uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Installable Pa

tomcat 4.1.10 rpm available

At the usual location : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/rpms/ --- Tomcat 4 RPM info the RPM will be named tomcat4 to allow coexistence with the actual tomcat 3.x RPM (3.2.x and 3.3) Here is the release notes for the tomcat4.0.x RPM builds. o Starting with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10328] - Rpm doesn't install with correct ownership/permissions

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10328 Rpm doesn't install with correct ownership/permissions --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-01 08:30 --- Thanks to specify which rpm release (there is a second release available) and which directories are faulty owned -- To unsubscr

tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release 2

Available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/ More FHS compliant and misc fixes in spec files. Important change from previous version, is that the rpm didn't use no more IBM SDK 1.3.1 as default SDK. Read the following RPM

RE: tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release

...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:13 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release > > >Than

Re: tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release

Thanks for your hard work, Henri! =D - Original Message - From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:27 AM Subject:

tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release

Available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/ This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org) Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory : jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm

RE: tomcat 4.0.4b2 rpm available

>Ok, I understand now -- from your announcement of the RPM I >thought the FHS work had been done, but you are saying that it >has not been done but will be done prior to the final RPM of >4.0.4. I guess that makes more sense. :-) I haven't looked at >these new RPMs too c

RE: tomcat 4.0.4b2 rpm available

Ok, I understand now -- from your announcement of the RPM I thought the FHS work had been done, but you are saying that it has not been done but will be done prior to the final RPM of 4.0.4. I guess that makes more sense. :-) I haven't looked at these new RPMs too closely but I noti

RE: tomcat 4.0.4b2 rpm available

SRPM and see if I >couldn't help out, but I don't have junit and xalan-j RPMs >(and can't seem to find them on their respective home pages). You could find them at www.jpackage.org, a Java RPM packaging project which cover many many java tools (I'm also involved there) &

RE: tomcat 4.0.4b2 rpm available

ey be built (I can try my hand at it) and included in the same directory for people who want to download and build via SRPM? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:25 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: tomcat 4.0.4b

tomcat 4.0.4b2 rpm available

With some delay they are available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4-b2/rpms/ BTW : connector stuff is not updated since I'll wait for a mod_webapp 1.2.0 and mod_jk 1.2.1 release and make rpms for them. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5952] New: - Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5952 Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist Summary: Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.1 Final Platform: PC OS/Version:

RE: [VOTE] tomcat 4 rpm to re-use standard listening ports ?

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] tomcat 4 rpm to re-use standard listening ports ? > > > Hi, > > As you may know, the current

[VOTE] tomcat 4 rpm to re-use standard listening ports ?

Hi, As you may know, the current tomcat 4 rpm change all the listen ports (http10, http11, ajp) to assure a pacific ;) coexistence between with an allready installed tomcat3. I wonder if it won't be time to restore the original ports, just to avoid users questions. I'll provide a lit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8032] - mod_webapp RPM missing

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8032 mod_webapp RPM missing --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-29 14:08 --- I'll try to make a rpm from the latest 4.1 snapshot. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8032] - mod_webapp RPM missing

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8032 mod_webapp RPM missing [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8356] - Can't remove this package using rpm version 4.0.3

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8356 Can't remove this package using rpm version 4.0.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://jakarta.apache.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8356] New: - Can't remove this package using rpm version 4.0.3

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8356 Can't remove this package using rpm version 4.0.3 Summary: Can't remove this package using rpm version 4.0.3 Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0 Beta 3 Platform: PC URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/build

Re: patch for tomcat rc script in RPM

Hi, Please note that : * the /etc/init.d used in tomcat rpms right now intentionnaly moved all variable definitions to /etc/tomcat3/conf/tomcat3.conf, so people could redefine them in a configuration file rpm would not replace after each

RE: patch for tomcat rc script in RPM

Seems a good patch, I'm +1 and will include it at least on my rpm - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-

patch for tomcat rc script in RPM

All, I'm not sure if this is worthwhile for anyone else but my company but myself and a coworker (Jason Maderios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote a patch that saves the contents of the /var/log/tomcat3/tomcat.log file when tomcat is shutdown just in case we ever need the contents for future referenc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8155] New: - Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8155 Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate Summary: Tomcat from RPM doesn't do logrotate Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3.1 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8154] New: - logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8154 logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file Summary: logrotate script in RPM rotates non-existing file Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8107] New: - uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107 uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible Summary: uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.3 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8032] New: - mod_webapp RPM missing

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8032 mod_webapp RPM missing Summary: mod_webapp RPM missing Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.3 Final Platform: All URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat- 4.0/release/v4.0.3/rpms/ OS/V

Apache 2.0.35 Linux RPM available

Hi to all, You could find the Apache 2.0.35 rpm for Linux at : http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/ apache2-2.0.35-1.src.rpm apache2-2.0.35-1.i386.rpm apache2-devel-2.0.35-1.i386.rpm apache2-manual-2.0.35-1.i386.rpm There are signed with my PGP key (the same used

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6560] - naming-factory.jar from Tomcat 4.0.2 RPM not complete

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 naming-factory.jar from Tomcat 4.0.2 RPM not complete [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.0.2 Final |4.0.3

RE: [PATCH] build.xml tomcat 4.0.2-3 rpm

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 4:01 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PATCH] build.xml tomcat 4.0.2-3 rpm > > >This is a patch to fix >$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev/sample/build.xml. It >had a javadoc >element that was closed twi

[PATCH] build.xml tomcat 4.0.2-3 rpm

This is a patch to fix $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev/sample/build.xml. It had a javadoc element that was closed twice on line 302. -- Kevin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Tomcat 4.x RPM listen port and documentation

ndard ports numbers. Question: Do you think I should update the online documentation in RPM to reflect the changes ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6761] - The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6761 The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6761] - The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6761 The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6761] - The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6761 The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://localhost:8080/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6761] New: - The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6761 The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port Summary: The rpm of tomcat4-webapps-4.0.2-3.noarch.rpm has the wrong port Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.2 Final Platform: PC URL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6560] New: - naming-factory.jar from Tomcat 4.0.2 RPM not complete

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 naming-factory.jar from Tomcat 4.0.2 RPM not complete Summary: naming-factory.jar from Tomcat 4.0.2 RPM not complete Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.2 Final Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Se

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5415] - manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count?

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5415 manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count? [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6486] - Documentation error for RPM install

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6486 Documentation error for RPM install [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5513] - $CLASSPATH in /usr/bin/dtomcat4 from the RPM package

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5513 $CLASSPATH in /usr/bin/dtomcat4 from the RPM package [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4801] - Many documents included with webapps 4.0.1 RPM are zero length

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4801 Many documents included with webapps 4.0.1 RPM are zero length [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5112] - tomcat4 rpm missing doc files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5112 tomcat4 rpm missing doc files [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5113] - tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6235] - tomcat4-4.0.1-1 rpm has wrong owner for /var/tomcat4/webapps

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6235 tomcat4-4.0.1-1 rpm has wrong owner for /var/tomcat4/webapps [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Unknown |Insta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6486] - Documentation error for RPM install

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6486 Documentation error for RPM install [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Unknown |Installable Packages

Re: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Starting from Tomcat 3.3.1-B1 we could use this stuff > > to have a 100% OSS Java SSL solution and good alternative > > to JSSE > > Next step Tomcat 4.0.3? Yes, I think so. I've been pretty swamped so I haven't had time to move the 3.3. patc

Re: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

Nick Betteridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > JXTA holds puretls and cryptix jars on jxta.org - so it shouldn't be a > problem on jakarta. > > Incidently, tls is not ssl, although there are many similarities. TLS is not SSL, but pretty much every implementation that supports both (most do) uses t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6486] New: - Documentation error for RPM install

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6486 Documentation error for RPM install Summary: Documentation error for RPM install Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.2 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority:

Re: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >JXTA holds puretls and cryptix jars on jxta.org - so it shouldn't be a > >problem on jakarta. > > > >Incidently, tls is not ssl, although there are many similarities. > > > >Just one question - are tls socket factories available for tomcat? > > You means TLSSocket instead

RE: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

>JXTA holds puretls and cryptix jars on jxta.org - so it shouldn't be a >problem on jakarta. > >Incidently, tls is not ssl, although there are many similarities. > >Just one question - are tls socket factories available for tomcat? You means TLSSocket instead of SSLSocket ? -- To unsubscribe, e-

Re: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

native > to JSSE > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > >>> TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : > >> >

Re: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

F8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > >-Original Message- > >From: GOMEZ Henri > >Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:23 AM > >To: Tomcat Developers List > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache - WAS:

Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

y 13, 2002 1:23 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache - WAS: Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM >available > > >>> TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : >> >>The new RPM packaging looks much cleaner,

PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache - WAS: Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM available

>> TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : > >The new RPM packaging looks much cleaner, and this time it should be >compliant with the official standard, right ? Yes, and I hope to see other jakarta/xml projects use these kind of packaging. BTW, openjmx RPM is ready, and also puretls, c

Re: Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM available

> TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : The new RPM packaging looks much cleaner, and this time it should be compliant with the official standard, right ? :) Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM available

tarball (regexp), or should be present on system at build time (xerces). All of these jar are then distributed in the binary tarball or in the binary RPM at build time. The Tomcat 4.0.2 RPM will no more include these jars since they will be available in their own RPM packages. These RPMs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6235] New: - tomcat4-4.0.1-1 rpm has wrong owner for /var/tomcat4/webapps

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6235 tomcat4-4.0.1-1 rpm has wrong owner for /var/tomcat4/webapps Summary: tomcat4-4.0.1-1 rpm has wrong owner for /var/tomcat4/webapps Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.1 Final Platform: PC OS/Version:

Re: bug in /usr/bin/dtomcat3 script in 3-3.3a-2 rpm (mprotect errors in tomcat.log)

ect reset: Bad address > mprotect reset: Bad address > EmbededTomcat: Startup time 40 > > > right around line 120, there's an '==' in the TOMCAT_OPTS line. I > removed one = and tomcat started. > It seems it was in original tomcat.sh, I'll fix in n

bug in /usr/bin/dtomcat3 script in 3-3.3a-2 rpm (mprotect errors intomcat.log)

Hi, I just installed the 3.3a rpms and when I tried starting tomcat with the /etc/rc.d/init.d/tomcat3 script, all I got was these in the /var/log/tomcat3/tomcat.log file: mprotect: Bad address mprotect reset: Bad address mprotect reset: Bad address EmbededTomcat: Startup time 40 right around l

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6056] New: - RPM Installation needs to be sorted out

/nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6056 > >RPM Installation needs to be sorted out > > Summary: RPM Installation needs to be sorted out > Product: Tomcat 4 > Version: 4.0 Beta 1 > Platform: All >OS/Version: Linux >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6056] - RPM Installation needs to be sorted out

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6056 RPM Installation needs to be sorted out [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6056] New: - RPM Installation needs to be sorted out

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6056 RPM Installation needs to be sorted out Summary: RPM Installation needs to be sorted out Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0 Beta 1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Critical Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5513] New: - $CLASSPATH in /usr/bin/dtomcat4 from the RPM package

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5513 $CLASSPATH in /usr/bin/dtomcat4 from the RPM package Summary: $CLASSPATH in /usr/bin/dtomcat4 from the RPM package Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.1 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Se

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5415] - manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count?

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5415 manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count? [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Unknown |

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5113] - tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Unknown |Installable Packages

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5112] - tomcat4 rpm missing doc files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5112 tomcat4 rpm missing doc files [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Unknown |Installable Packages -- To unsubscr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5415] New: - manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count?

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5415 manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count? Summary: manual rpm requires a webserver, but tomcat doesn't count? Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.1 Final Platform: PC O

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4801] - Many documents included with webapps 4.0.1 RPM are zero length

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4801 Many documents included with webapps 4.0.1 RPM are zero length --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-12-10 07:44 --- It also appears that several of the image filse have been corrupted. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5112] - tomcat4 rpm missing doc files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5112 tomcat4 rpm missing doc files [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Addi

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5113] - tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files

Will be fixed with release 4.0.2 of rpm - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5113] - tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-12-04 02:40 --- when you look at the files you wil see that they are zero bytes when installed from the rpm, the files are there, but empty alas. -- To unsubscribe,

Re: RPM new packaging proposal

It looks like FHS compliant. I like symlinks too. +1 (although I always use the tarball :-) Bojan GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Hi to all, > > I want to propose a new packaging policy for Tomcat, > 3.2/3.3/4.0 RPMs. > > Up to now, the Tomcat RPM which are built from the source

RPM new packaging proposal

Hi to all, I want to propose a new packaging policy for Tomcat, 3.2/3.3/4.0 RPMs. Up to now, the Tomcat RPM which are built from the source present in jakarta site and include the binary jars present in the source tarball. To respect the general RPM packaging method (Mandrake, Redhat, Suse

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5113] - tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 tomcat4-manual-4.0.1-1 rpm missing files --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-26 20:16 --- also i should add the not-so-humble comment :) that (since there is no tomcat4 user on the system) maybe a better and more standard place for these docs

  1   2   >