Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Generic interface, of course :)
>
> Nice ...
What's the point of doing otherwise?
>> But I didn't say I'm going to do it... :)
>
> D'oh! Maybe I'll have to send my men into your home again, and maybe
> this time they steal your primary mod
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
> >> Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I haven't looked at Jikes, so can't comment on the suitability of any APIs
> >>> it exposes. Would someone like to look at
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>> Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't looked at Jikes, so can't comment on the suitability of any APIs
>>> it exposes. Would someone like to look at this and report back?
>>
>> Last time I l
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I haven't looked at Jikes, so can't comment on the suitability of any APIs
> > it exposes. Would someone like to look at this and report back?
>
> Last time I looked at the sources (when I was at IBM, 1+1/2
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I haven't looked at Jikes, so can't comment on the suitability of any APIs
> it exposes. Would someone like to look at this and report back?
Last time I looked at the sources (when I was at IBM, 1+1/2 years ago),
Jikes was not relying on threa
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The real solution is to get Sun to get off their high horse and OSS the
> javac compiler and/or not do stupid things like remove something that tons
> of people depend on and not give an alternative way to do things.
I have to disagree, this time.. The
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
>
> "JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" wrote:
> >
> > Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
> > our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
> >
> > We can work with an external comp
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Paul Speed wrote:
>
>
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> >
> > There are some pretty intense discussions going on about this, and the
> > story hasn't yet been finished ...
> >
> > On the other hand, the "new" compiler entry point has an absolutely
> > horrible feature (fro
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Jikes works fine.
>
> The issue is that Jikes is a C++ binary and isn't ported to every platform.
Oh yeah ... =)
> It also makes installation/distribution issues a bit more tricky than simply
> calling a Java class file...
Yep. I figured the issue was that it would requ
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Time to drop Javac and just use Jikes...
LOL! I hadn't even read this one when I (just now) asked my "why not
just go with Jikes" question. I've started noticing that Jon and I think
alot alike, from HTML-formatted e-mail to documention approaches to JSP
to compiler techn
on 7/20/01 3:45 PM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a question to satisfy my own curiosity (and possibly point out my
> compiler ignorance WRT using sun.tool.javac.Main and/or JSP compilation
> [since I don't do JSP]). You mention speed being the primary factor in
> using the
"JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" wrote:
>
> Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
> our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
>
> We can work with an external compiler, but for speed, we much prefer
> sun.tool.javac.Main.
Ju
on 7/20/01 12:11 PM, "JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
> our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
>
> We can work with an external compiler, but for speed, we
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> There are some pretty intense discussions going on about this, and the
> story hasn't yet been finished ...
>
> On the other hand, the "new" compiler entry point has an absolutely
> horrible feature (from the point of view of Jasper) -- you have to modify
> Sys
JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
> our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
>
> We can work with an external compiler, but for speed, we much prefer
> sun.tool
Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sun.tools.javac.Main will be removed from JDK1.4
>
>
> There are some pretty intense discussions going on about
16 matches
Mail list logo
