RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Thanks all. The APXS patch which I applied was not being used. After I ensured that the patched version was being executed, the mod_jk.so built properly. The changes to libtool were not necessary. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer C-Kermit 7.1 Alpha available The Kermit Project @

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
nal Message- >From: Jeffrey Altman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 5:08 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6 > > >I applied the patch to APXS. > >I replaced /usr/bin/libtool (version "1.

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I applied the patch to APXS. I replaced /usr/bin/libtool (version "1.3.4") with the one from the Apache 2.0 distribution (version "1.3.4-freebsd-ports"). ./build-unix.sh now completes successfully and produces [root@IAM40 apache2.0]# ls -l /usr/local/apache2/modules/ total 12 -rw-r--r-

Re: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread jean-frederic clere
+++ CUT +++ > (cd .libs && rm -f mod_jk.la && ln -s ../mod_jk.la mod_jk.la) > libtool --mode=compile gcc -pthread -I/usr/local/apache2/include > -I../common -I/ > opt/IBMJava2-13/include -I/opt/IBMJava2-13/include/linux -c > ../common/jk_ajp12_ > worker.c && touch ../common/jk_ajp12_worker.slo >

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> APR is Apache Portable Runtime (apr.apache.org) > > Could you give us the libtool version ? > I've used Redhat 6.0 and many things were damaged. actually, it is RH 6.1 The libtool version is ### BEGIN LIBTOOL CONFIG # Libtool was configured as follows, on host foo: # # CC="gcc" CFLA

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
CTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6 > > >> >> Other idea is a broken libtool... try with the one that is in APR. >> > >I'm sorry. APR? > > > > Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer C-K

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Something I know well :) >> >> Which version of Apache 2.0 have you ? >> Up to the latest, the apxs was broken. >> >> I recommand you take a look at Makefile.linux >> in TC 3.3 :) >> > >Thanks for your help. The Apache version is 2.0.16 > >I've looked at the Makefile.linux and that apparent

Re: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> > Other idea is a broken libtool... try with the one that is in APR. > I'm sorry. APR? Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer C-Kermit 7.1 Alpha available The Kermit Project @ Columbia University includes Secure Telnet and FTP http://www.kermit-project.org/ using Ker

Re: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread jean-frederic clere
Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > > Something I know well :) > > > > Which version of Apache 2.0 have you ? > > Up to the latest, the apxs was broken. > > > > I recommand you take a look at Makefile.linux > > in TC 3.3 :) > > > > Thanks for your help. The Apache version is 2.0.16 > > I've looked at th

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> Something I know well :) > > Which version of Apache 2.0 have you ? > Up to the latest, the apxs was broken. > > I recommand you take a look at Makefile.linux > in TC 3.3 :) > Thanks for your help. The Apache version is 2.0.16 I've looked at the Makefile.linux and that apparently has less

RE: mod_jk for Apache 2.0 not building on Red Hat 6

2001-06-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Something I know well :) Which version of Apache 2.0 have you ? Up to the latest, the apxs was broken. I recommand you take a look at Makefile.linux in TC 3.3 :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(