RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

Message- >From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:13 PM >To: 'Tomcat Developers List' >Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > >> -Original Message- >> From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

> -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24. lipanj 2002 18:10 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > > >+1 at both, if my opinion matters ;-) > > Yes, it count. > > S

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

>+1 at both, if my opinion matters ;-) Yes, it count. So Mladen, let's go and commit. We all three (others welcomed) will make another stress-test operation tomorrow. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

> > to be simple we could just use time() and getdifftime for > > 1.2.0 release. 1.2.1 could use more sophisticated code. > > > +1. > I'll rearange the cache_timeout to use the 0 as default meaning > disabled, OK? +1 at both, if my opinion matters ;-) d:-> Jan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

> -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24. lipanj 2002 17:57 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > to be simple we could just use time() and getdifftime for > 1.2.0 relea

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

>> >The APR on unix for apr_time_now() uses gettimeofday, and >> then we could >> >use the timeval's tv_sec, and on WIN32 GetTickCount, since all that >> >matters is the time interval. >> >> gettimeofday may cost a little bit more and it's not >> necessary to have tv_usec for timeout count in

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

> -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24. lipanj 2002 17:33 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > > >The APR on unix for apr_time_now() uses gettimeofday, and > then we coul

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

>The APR on unix for apr_time_now() uses gettimeofday, and then we could >use the timeval's tv_sec, and on WIN32 GetTickCount, since all that >matters is the time interval. gettimeofday may cost a little bit more and it's not necessary to have tv_usec for timeout count in seconds or minutes. For

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

> -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24. lipanj 2002 14:21 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > > >Basically I don't like the time. The alternative is to use something &g

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

t;From: GOMEZ Henri >Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:21 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > >>Henri thinks we should discuss that here, so I'm forwarding >>the original mail. > >Sure that's OSS way ;) > >>

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

>Henri thinks we should discuss that here, so I'm forwarding >the original mail. Sure that's OSS way ;) >Basically I don't like the time. The alternative is to use something >like GetTickCount(). there is no gettickcount under Unix, but you could use gettickcount on WIN32 if it's faster. >The