RE: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-08 Thread mettu . kumar
arcus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 7:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question on HTTPConnector. Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 2:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

RE: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-08 Thread Deacon Marcus
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 2:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question on HTTPConnector. > > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro

RE: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-07 Thread mettu . kumar
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question on HTTPConnector. On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Looking at org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HTTPConnector I got a > question regarding the way its implemented.(I am looking at 4.0b3 src) > > > Look at this blo

RE: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-07 Thread mettu . kumar
xception e) { ; } Kumar. -Original Message- From: Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question on HTTPConnector. On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Well yes, it's ba

Re: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-07 Thread Donald Ball
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Well yes, it's bad, but so will any other reaction. What choices are > there in handling it? > > (1) Current behavior of closing the connection and go back to > accepting new connections (causes a client-side protocol error) > > (2) Pause and

Re: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Looking at org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HTTPConnector I got a > question regarding the way its implemented.(I am looking at 4.0b3 src) > > > Look at this block of code(in run method of HTTPConnector): > // Hand this socket off t