RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13

Thanks Keith. I would not go to 3.3 for the time being. Is there a patch for 3.2.1? Peter -Original Message- From: Keith Wannamaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13 Hi Peter, this

RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13

it is possible. Keith -Original Message- From: Peter Dai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13 Thanks Keith. I would not go to 3.3 for the time being. Is there a patch for 3.2.1? Peter -Ori

RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13

:479) -Original Message- From: Dan Milstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13 Peter, There was a bug with POST size > 8K. This has been fixed in the 3.2 and 3.3 branches in cvs. I

Re: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13

Peter, There was a bug with POST size > 8K. This has been fixed in the 3.2 and 3.3 branches in cvs. I am almost certain that it was fixed in the 3.2.1 release available at: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html If you are using the 3.2.1 release and are still seeing this problem, pleas

RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk and ajp13 Dan, Thanks for the help. I changed to tomcat 3.2.1 and it worked for large size POST with parameters. However, it still fails for POST with object, and here is the stack trace: Thanks, Peter java.io.StreamCorruptedException: Caught