Re: JAAS Auth

2003-03-12 Thread Costin Manolache
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I'm close to get JAAS realm and the memory LoginModule working - if I >>remember correctly we agreed to make JAAS the default for 5.0 ( I don't >>remember any objections ). >> > What about authorization :-) Righ now, the Realm implementation includes > the 3

Re: JAAS Auth

2003-03-12 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Costin Manolache wrote: Hi, I'm close to get JAAS realm and the memory LoginModule working - if I remember correctly we agreed to make JAAS the default for 5.0 ( I don't remember any objections ). What about authorization :-) Righ now, the Realm implementation includes the 3 authorization meth

RE: JAAS Auth

2003-03-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Filip Hanik wrote: > Just an FYI: > In JBoss JAAS doesn't really work as expected, > > if you log in under a context say > > mywar > | > -protected > -unprotected > > then getPrincipal() returns null for the "unprotected" > subcontext(directory), but returns the principal under the secure

Re: JAAS Auth

2003-03-11 Thread David Graff
Costin, Sorry to mail you directly, but this doesn't seem like a major group discussion kind of thing. At work I'm doing a project that has an interesting set of criteria for user authentication that I haven't really seen a way to do with JAAS readily. Basically it boils down to this, a user has

RE: JAAS Auth

2003-03-11 Thread Filip Hanik
Just an FYI: In JBoss JAAS doesn't really work as expected, if you log in under a context say mywar | -protected -unprotected then getPrincipal() returns null for the "unprotected" subcontext(directory), but returns the principal under the secured subcontext. we don't want that to happ