> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 23:26
>
> Tomcat 3.2 has *only* happened because Tomcat 4.0 wasn't ready.
>
And I wonder when is it going to be.
That is why I want the 3.3 alternative.
> Remember the history of Tom
Agreed!
Let Costin and the others make their job and then let code talk.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: F
>
>
> Whoever wants to develop on tomcat 4 does so.
> Whoever wants to develop on tomcat 3 does so.
+1
Eventually a winning container will emerge. Forcing people to abandon the
current, production release will not work - they'll just go elsewhere, that
won't help anyone. If everyone concentrates
Well, I am not that good at getting all this flames ( and to be honest I'm
not used to get the "thanks" that I got lately - mostly in private mail -
it looks like a very different world, and an wonderful Christmas gift for
me )
In any case, I'll try to stay away from further arguments - I know no
L PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: F
on 12/21/2000 2:18 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomcat3.2 is a big step forward versus Tomcat3.1 - but it still have many
> issues - take a look at the ContextManager in 3.3, compa
on 12/21/2000 2:18 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomcat3.2 is a big step forward versus Tomcat3.1 - but it still have many
> issues - take a look at the ContextManager in 3.3, compare it with 3.2 -
> there are still many undefined behaviors, even code from 3.0.
Tomcat 3.2
> > I just had to deal with a major change in Apache2.0 -
> > it seems some time ago they reorganized the whole
> > tree,
> > moved apr in a different repository, etc. Is this a
> > different architecture ?
>
> Apache 2.0 is not yet OUT in final... Try to go down in HTTP land and
> build a 1.4 on
> >
> > The future of Tomcat 3.3 seems to be outside Apache now.
> > It's really sad.
>
> Sorry, but that's not what I said Henry. Last month I even came up with
> a proposal that got accepted (but never turned to reality) on how to
> handle this situation... But it seems to me, that everyone he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't mean to sound as though I am a prude, but we do a lot of our
> consulting at customer sites, much of it face-to-face with the customer's
> staff and management. I can control what messages I read and when but I
> cannot control when people are in my office and
I don't mean to sound as though I am a prude, but we do a lot of our
consulting at customer sites, much of it face-to-face with the customer's
staff and management. I can control what messages I read and when but I
cannot control when people are in my office and when the message alert with
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
