Re: Apache 2.0 - webapps

2002-04-17 Thread Punky Tse
> Has anyone successfully been able to connect Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 4.0. > > The webapp interface has the following error when loading Apache: > Cannot load /apache2/modules/mod_webapp.so into server: ld.so.1: > /cdldevel2/loy/apache2/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file > /cdldevel2/loy/ap

Re: Apache 2.0 - webapps

2002-04-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"David Loy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone successfully been able to connect Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 4.0. > > The webapp interface has the following error when loading Apache: > Cannot load /apache2/modules/mod_webapp.so into server: ld.so.1: > /cdldevel2/loy/apache2/bin/httpd: fatal: rel

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread cmanolache
Another update - I got mod_jk up and running, it can serve a simple servlet or a jsp page. There are few bugs for some pages, I'll work on it tommorow. Costin > > Ops, sorry about that. > > Now it compiles - but crashes with SIGSEGV in reinit_scoreboard. > I'll try with dexter, it seems

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread cmanolache
Ops, sorry about that. Now it compiles - but crashes with SIGSEGV in reinit_scoreboard. I'll try with dexter, it seems it may work without a scoreboard , and I'll also try again to compile a file-based scoreboad. Damn, Linux was supposed to be a bit better... What's very strange is that all th

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread cmanolache
> > > > I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. > > There are known issues with _a9. I would suggest ignoring it completely. Ok, good to know. I'll stay with the CVS then. > > Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 using anonymous CVS, and I get: > > > > ap_bucket

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread rbb
H.. > I have all the good intentions in doing this, but I'm unable to get > Apache2.0 to work... > > I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. There are known issues with _a9. I would suggest ignoring it completely. > Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 us

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread cmanolache
Hi Ryan, I have all the good intentions in doing this, but I'm unable to get Apache2.0 to work... I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 using anonymous CVS, and I get: ap_buckets_file.c && touch ap_buckets_file.lo ap_buckets_f

RE: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 5:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 > > >Hi, > >I am able to compile Apache2.0, and I updated mod_jk >for the modified functions in 2.0 - it now compiles. > >I'm

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-18 Thread rbb
Wow. That was fast. I am in the middle of compiling Apache 2.0 on locus so that we can run it with locus's config file on port 8080. I expect we will release the alpha on Friday unless something goes wrong, Once I have Apache running on port 8080 on locus, we can work on getting mod_jk install

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-18 Thread Costin Manolache
Hi, I am able to compile Apache2.0, and I updated mod_jk for the modified functions in 2.0 - it now compiles. I'm pretty confident we can have it running in few days - it did worked before and it works fine with other multithreaded servers. As you can see, most of the code in mod_jk is indpenden

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-17 Thread cmanolache
> > should be very amenable to the Apache 2.0 infrastructure. I would not > > personally spend any time trying to make mod_jk or mod_jserv work in a 2.0 > > environment, when the future is clearly in a different direction. > > Since I believe in a different future and direction, I'll spend the >

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-16 Thread cmanolache
> On the other hand, it should be noted that mod_jk has substantial deficiencies. > Like mod_jserv before it, this connector is substantially limited -- it requires > users to double-configure many of the key attributes of a web application > (security, mapping URIs to particular handlers, MIME-ty

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Some of you probably know that the httpd group is getting ready to release > > Apache 2.0. We are all set to release our first beta on Friday. As a > > part of this, we are looking into getting Apache.org running 2.0. So, the > > next question we have to deal with

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-16 Thread cmanolache
> Some of you probably know that the httpd group is getting ready to release > Apache 2.0. We are all set to release our first beta on Friday. As a > part of this, we are looking into getting Apache.org running 2.0. So, the > next question we have to deal with is how does Tomcat run on 2.0? >