+0 all, No time to help, sorry.
BTW: Thanks for Coyote, Tested briefly, it's awesome..!!
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: miércoles 13 de marzo de 2002 3:30
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: [PROPOSAL] Pro
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> +1 for all, with an expansion on the last point.
>
> Currently, Tomcat components all use the internal Logger APIs for logging
> both container event and error messages, as well as those from the web
> applications that are being run (i.e. calls to ServletContext
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> I think we can can deal with this by creating naming
Err, that was supposed to be "creative" naming ...
> of the underlying loggers, but wanted to gauge opinions before putting
> together a proposal for that.
>
> Craig
>
Craig
--
To unsub
+1 for all, with an expansion on the last point.
Currently, Tomcat components all use the internal Logger APIs for logging
both container event and error messages, as well as those from the web
applications that are being run (i.e. calls to ServletContext.log()).
What would people think of migrat
Remy,
+1 for all.
Patrick
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> There are many ways to take advantage of Coyote in Tomcat 4, but I'd like to
> start with some limited changes at first. Most of these proposed changes are
> Coyote-related (hence the subject of the message), and all involve some
> refactorin
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Also, I'm about to add in the TC 4 adapter the code used in TC 4 to
prevent
> > some URL based attacks (with a flag allowing to disable the checks,
though,
> > as this may be useless in the HEAD branch after the proposed
refactoring).
> > However,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Also, I'm about to add in the TC 4 adapter the code used in TC 4 to prevent
> some URL based attacks (with a flag allowing to disable the checks, though,
> as this may be useless in the HEAD branch after the proposed refactoring).
> However, I know tha
+0 for all. Wish I had more time to help.
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] Proposed integration of Coyote in 4.0-HEAD
>
>
> There are many ways to take ad
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> There are many ways to take advantage of Coyote in Tomcat 4, but I'd like to
> start with some limited changes at first. Most of these proposed changes are
> Coyote-related (hence the subject of the message), and all involve some
> refactoring / API additions.
>
> A) UR
> > A) URI decoding refactoring. To avoid doing some URI decoding in many
> places
> > in the pipeline, a decodedURI field (with associated getter/setter)
should
> > be added in the HttpRequest interface, and used in the Catalina
pipeline.
> > This also has the advantage to guarantee that no doubl
Disclaimer:
A +1 vote below does not necessarily mean that I'm going to pledge ongoing
support to o.a.c.tomcat4 (although it is very well done, and I relied
heavily on it for developing o.a.c.tomcat3). However, I do plan to support
o.a.c and o.a.c.http11.
- Original Message -
From: "Remy M
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposed integration of Coyote in 4.0-HEAD
> > on 3/12/02 6:30 PM, &quo
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> +1, share code, share code.
>
> I'll be +1 to have it also in 3.3.2
'decodedRequest' is already there, commons-logging is trivial to
add. The lifecycle of modules is also fine, the only problem is the
ordering of modules - but so far it is under cont
+1, share code, share code.
I'll be +1 to have it also in 3.3.2
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message--
> on 3/12/02 6:30 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A) URI decoding refactoring. To avoid doing some URI decoding in many
places
> > in the pipeline, a decodedURI field (with associated getter/setter)
should
> > be added in the HttpRequest interface, and used in the Catalina
pi
on 3/12/02 6:30 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A) URI decoding refactoring. To avoid doing some URI decoding in many places
> in the pipeline, a decodedURI field (with associated getter/setter) should
> be added in the HttpRequest interface, and used in the Catalina pipeline.
>
+1 for everything
Costin
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> There are many ways to take advantage of Coyote in Tomcat 4, but I'd like to
> start with some limited changes at first. Most of these proposed changes are
> Coyote-related (hence the subject of the message), and all involve
17 matches
Mail list logo
