Hey Rob ...
I think adding a quick note to RUNNING.txt would be definitely
worthwhile. Win98 out of the box apparently gives you a blank
config.sys, as I know for sure that I've never edited that file.
- Christopher
"Rob S." wrote:
>
> > BINGO! That was it. My config.sys didn't have anything i
> BINGO! That was it. My config.sys didn't have anything in it at
> all. Adding
> that line fixed it. Man ... there's an hour of my life I'll never
> get back.
A if you would have gotten "out of environment space" we would have
known sooner =) I got the "bad command or filename" thing the fi
> The standard startup scripts work fine for me on my Win98 laptop ... the
ditto for me...
- r
It is verified that Win2K is not subject to the security vulnerability.
Amy
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:00 PM
Subject: Re: Quick suggestion before the new beta tag
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Oh, ok.
> > It doesn't happen with NT/2k, right ?
>
> Just as a curiosity, try this one on your W2K (I was told it works on NT
> as well):
>
> 1. Open a command prompt.
> 2. Run a command, that runs for a little while (e.g. ping -t some host).
> 3. Press F7 and EN
Quoting Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I tried that with my server running on my laptop, and I got a 404. So
> I think it's ok.
Is that NT or Win2K?
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > > Sounds *very* similar to mine (original Win98, Sun JDK 1.3.0_02
although I
> > > don't think that matters if it's not even executing the startup script
> > > correctly).
> > >
> > > I've got the usual config.sys entry to increase environment vari
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I haven't tested it myself, but the original reporter said that he
> suspected it *would* fail on NT.
>
> You can try it for yourself on Win2K with the following URL:
>
> http://localhost:8080/.../
>
> If you get a directory listing of th
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Sheesh ... the only thing that catalina.bat puts on your CLASSPATH is
> %CATALINA_HOME%\bootstrap.jar and %JAVA_HOME%\lib\tools.jar -- if
> Win98 can't even do that without a custom configuration setting, that's
> pretty lame.
Actually, it wa
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Oh, ok.
> It doesn't happen with NT/2k, right ?
Just as a curiosity, try this one on your W2K (I was told it works on NT
as well):
1. Open a command prompt.
2. Run a command, that runs for a little while (e.g. ping -t some host).
3. Press F7 and ENTER repeatedly and qui
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Sounds *very* similar to mine (original Win98, Sun JDK 1.3.0_02 although I
> > don't think that matters if it's not even executing the startup script
> > correctly).
> >
> > I've got the usual config.sys entry to increase environment variable
> > s
> Sounds *very* similar to mine (original Win98, Sun JDK 1.3.0_02 although I
> don't think that matters if it's not even executing the startup script
> correctly).
>
> I've got the usual config.sys entry to increase environment variable
> space:
>
> shell=c:\command.com c:\ /e:4096 /p
>
> but
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
> Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I've got the usual config.sys entry to increase environment variable
> > space:
> >
> > shell=c:\command.com c:\ /e:4096 /p
>
> BINGO! That was it. My config.sys didn't have a
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> I've got the usual config.sys entry to increase environment variable
> space:
>
> shell=c:\command.com c:\ /e:4096 /p
BINGO! That was it. My config.sys didn't have anything in it at all. Adding
that line fixed it. Man ... there's a
Sounds *very* similar to mine (original Win98, Sun JDK 1.3.0_02 although I
don't think that matters if it's not even executing the startup script
correctly).
I've got the usual config.sys entry to increase environment variable
space:
shell=c:\command.com c:\ /e:4096 /p
but Tomcat 4 is *much*
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> By "the TC4 binary" do you mean the ZIP file or the new executable
> (.exe file) that includes an installer?
The zip.
> The standard startup scripts work fine for me on my Win98 laptop ...
> the "Catalina" thing is ignored and Tomcat starts j
By "the TC4 binary" do you mean the ZIP file or the new executable (.exe
file) that includes an installer?
The standard startup scripts work fine for me on my Win98 laptop ... the
"Catalina" thing is ignored and Tomcat starts just fine in a separate
window. Further, I've heard lots of other peop
To do my connector testing, I just installed the TC4 binary on a Win98 machine
(don't laugh :-)
Anyway, not being very DOS/Win knowledgable, it took me a few minutes to figure
out a slight problem with the Windoze startup logic that was causing it to
simply spit out "bad command or filename".
18 matches
Mail list logo
