RE: Problem with URLPatternMatcher

2001-06-26 Thread Marc Saegesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:55 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Problem with URLPatternMatcher > > > Well, I was but noticed it had this problem. I did fix the code, > however I > am not sure whether or not I am going to use it. I

RE: Problem with URLPatternMatcher

2001-06-25 Thread Creighton Kirkendall
-Original Message- From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with URLPatternMatcher Yep, it looks like this code is broken, but it isn't actually used anywhere within Tomcat. In fact it has

RE: Problem with URLPatternMatcher

2001-06-25 Thread Marc Saegesser
onday, June 25, 2001 8:57 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Problem with URLPatternMatcher > > > I have noticed that there is a problem in URLPatternMatcher. It > seems that > in the match function we do not update the length. This is a > problem because &

Problem with URLPatternMatcher

2001-06-25 Thread Creighton Kirkendall
I have noticed that there is a problem in URLPatternMatcher. It seems that in the match function we do not update the length. This is a problem because it causes the pattern matcher not to return the longest pattern. I noticed this some time ago but thought it was fixed in latter releases but it