[PATCH] Catalina CGIServlet broken redirects

Title: [PATCH] Catalina CGIServlet broken redirects Hello, The Catalina CGIServlet (as of tomcat 5.0.28) does not have a special case for handling "Status" headers set by a cgi script.  When a script tries to issue a redirect, tomcat returns inconsistent headers:   HTTP/1.x 200 O

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35302] - [PATCH] error page redirection for JK/ISAPI on service fail

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35302 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-23 00:02 --- To clarify why this patch is useful (this is the way we use the functionality). We usually deploy several applications to a single website, requiring multiple ISAPI redirectors. There are a cou

[PATCH] immediately observe JMX-driven host alias changes

ed to write the new aliases of the host back to server.xml, effective on restart. This patch communicates JMX-driven host alias changes to the mapper so that the alias is immediately available for use without any need for a restart, much like JMX-driven host removals/additions already work. The app

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector

f dealing with HTTP is left up to the ISAPI filters; IIS does very little for you. Anyway, my familiarity with the connector code involves the few hours I spent getting chunked encoding to work properly with IIS. I've tried to be a good citizen and report the problem with a potential patch.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35297] - [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-12 20:05 --- Created an attachment (id=16023) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16023&action=view) Patch enabling chunked transfer encoding for IIS -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36169] New: - [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36169 Summary: [PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connector Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.28 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Keywords: PatchAvailable Severity:

Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

Excellent, I'd love to see this end up in the proxy loadbalancer. I just submitted the patch: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 > Please do so... There is also some overlap with Apache's > proxy load balancer as well, which I would want to fold > back

Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Chris Lamprecht wrote: We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for "Busyness", and updated the jkstatus display page accordingly. I wanted to get any feedback or suggesti

Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

zilla entry for Native:JK and attach the patch. Please file that as enhancement. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RE: RE: RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

test from 12-16 requests per second to 60+ requests per second, and watching the jkstatus page showed that all servers were kept "evenly" busy. If one particular server slowed down, its Busy value increased, so it received fewer requests. We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We&

RE: RE: RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

ts Busy value increased, so it received fewer requests. We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for "Busyness", and updated the jkstatus display page accordingly. I wanted to get any feedback or suggesti

RE: RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

e showed that all servers were kept "evenly" busy. If one particular server slowed down, its Busy value increased, so it received fewer requests. We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for "Busyness&qu

RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

proved our test from 12-16 requests per second to 60+ requests per second, and watching the jkstatus page showed that all servers were kept "evenly" busy. If one particular server slowed down, its Busy value increased, so it received fewer requests. We'd like to submit our patc

patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

own, its Busy value increased, so it received fewer requests. We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for "Busyness", and updated the jkstatus display page accordingly. I wanted to get any feedback or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36020] - Patch for Enhancement of MemoryUserDatabase

|FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 15:14 --- I applied the patch, but I changed "persistable" -> "writeable". Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36020] - Patch for Enhancement of MemoryUserDatabase

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36020] New: - Patch for Enhancement of MemoryUserDatabase

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36020 Summary: Patch for Enhancement of MemoryUserDatabase Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.10 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Ca

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:55 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Scott Marlow wrote: > > > >> Anyway, my point is that this could be a worthwhile enhancement for > >> applications that run on Tomcat. What I don't understand yet is whether > >> the same functionality is already

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Remy Maucherat wrote: Scott Marlow wrote: Anyway, my point is that this could be a worthwhile enhancement for applications that run on Tomcat. What I don't understand yet is whether the same functionality is already in Tomcat. I should point out that some applications shouldn't limit the max

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32968] - [connectors][PATCH] Documentation fixes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35336] - RFE: JK 1.2.13 (isapi_redirect) should be able to bypass IIS authentication, patch provided

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35297] - [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI

|LATER Summary|[PATCH] Chunked transfer|[PATCH] Chunked transfer |encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI |encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 11:27 --- The complexity of your patch it too big to be considered as bug. Somethin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35302] - [PATCH] error page redirection for JK/ISAPI on service fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35289] - [PATCH] - Allow a redirect parameter in the Form_Authentication

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35336] New: - RFE: JK 1.2.13 (isapi_redirect) should be able to bypass IIS authentication, patch provided

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35336 Summary: RFE: JK 1.2.13 (isapi_redirect) should be able to bypass IIS authentication, patch provided Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Statu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35302] - [PATCH] error page redirection for JK/ISAPI on service fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35302] - [PATCH] error page redirection for JK/ISAPI on service fail

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35302 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-10 00:31 --- Created an attachment (id=15361) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15361&action=view) Error page support for ISAPI redirector Patch against jk_isapi_p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35302] New: - [PATCH] error page redirection for JK/ISAPI on service fail

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35302 Summary: [PATCH] error page redirection for JK/ISAPI on service fail Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: enhan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35297] - [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35297 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 22:33 --- Created an attachment (id=15357) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15357&action=view) Chunked encoding patch for JK/ISAPI Patch against jk_isapi_plugin.c r1.49

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35297] New: - [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35297 Summary: [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS JK/ISAPI Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35289] New: - [PATCH] - Allow a redirect parameter in the Form_Authentication

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35289 Summary: [PATCH] - Allow a redirect parameter in the Form_Authentication Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.30 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35289] - [PATCH] - Allow a redirect parameter in the Form_Authentication

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS

Tim Whittington wrote: This patch adds chunked encoding for IIS responses - i.e. Transfer-Encoding: chunked responses for HTTP/1.1 clients - allowing IIS to maintain persistent connections to HTTP/1.1 clients through the ISAPI redirector. Could you create a bugzilla entry for that as an

[PATCH] Chunked transfer encoding for IIS

This patch adds chunked encoding for IIS responses - i.e. Transfer-Encoding: chunked responses for HTTP/1.1 clients - allowing IIS to maintain persistent connections to HTTP/1.1 clients through the ISAPI redirector. IIS hands a lot of the responsibility for HTTP protocol handling to the

[Q/PATCH] ws_write call to ap_rflush

Calling ap_rflush() at the end of ws_write() in mod_jk.c is causing me problems when doing downloads from the server to a client. Performance degradation and, less importantly, memory usage,  are the problems.   During calls to ap_rwrite() in ws_write, a brigade is created and used to move data.

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Scott Marlow wrote: Anyway, my point is that this could be a worthwhile enhancement for applications that run on Tomcat. What I don't understand yet is whether the same functionality is already in Tomcat. I should point out that some applications shouldn't limit the max number of concurrent reques

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34801] - PATCH: CGIServlet does not kill CGI child process on IOException, nor terminate child after a timeout

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34801 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-08 06:49 --- Created an attachment (id=14964) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14964&action=view) This patch adds IOException trapping to CGIServlet, to ensure process termina

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34801] New: - PATCH: CGIServlet does not kill CGI child process on IOException, nor terminate child after a timeout

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34801 Summary: PATCH: CGIServlet does not kill CGI child process on IOException, nor terminate child after a timeout Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Statu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

not that > useful anymore (and we're also not going to use the concurrent utilities > in Tomcat, so it's not really an option before we require Java 5). The > main issue is that due to the fact keepalive is done in blocking mode, > actual concurrency in the servlet conta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: I'm still trying to understand the APR connector, but from what I see it is still mapping one socket ( 'keep alive' connection ) per thread. No it doesn't. If the connection is keep-alive, and there is no activity for 100ms, the s

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Costin Manolache wrote: Which file implements this ( the 100ms timeout and poller ) ? Poller is inside: /jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java 100ms timeout and passing to poller is in: /jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Ht

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Costin Manolache wrote: No it doesn't. If the connection is keep-alive, and there is no activity for 100ms, the socket is put in the poller, and that thread is freed. When the next data on that socket arrives, the socket is signaled and passed to the thread pool. Mladen. Sorry, I missed that. So w

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: I'm still trying to understand the APR connector, but from what I see it is still mapping one socket ( 'keep alive' connection ) per thread. No it doesn't. If the connection is keep-alive, and there is no activity for 100ms, the socket is put in the pol

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Costin Manolache wrote: I'm still trying to understand the APR connector, but from what I see it is still mapping one socket ( 'keep alive' connection ) per thread. No it doesn't. If the connection is keep-alive, and there is no activity for 100ms, the socket is put in the poller, and that thread

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Costin Manolache wrote: Further more I don't see how can you avoid keep-alive connection problems without using a thread-per-connection model. The point is that with 100 keep-alive connections you will still have 100 busy threads. Why ? 100 keep alive connections doesn't mean 100 active requests, i

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

ly thing that is required is to have a thread per active request - the sleepy keep alives don't need thread ( that could be implemented using select in the apr, or nio in java ) Your patch is basically a much nicer implementation of maxThreads (assuming it doesn't reduce performance) wh

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Mladen Turk wrote: Scott Marlow wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone has any feedback on a performance change that I am working on making. Can you compare the performance of you code with the standard implementation when the concurrency is lower then maxThreads value? I see no point to make patches that

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Scott Marlow wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone has any feedback on a performance change that I am working on making. Can you compare the performance of you code with the standard implementation when the concurrency is lower then maxThreads value? I see no point to make patches that will deal with c

Re: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

is a good solution for it), then the problem goes away. Your patch is basically a much nicer implementation of maxThreads (assuming it doesn't reduce performance) which would be useful for the regular HTTP connector, so it's cool, but not worth it. Overall, I think the way maxThrea

RE: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

From: Scott Marlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:42 AM > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency... > > Hi, > > I wonder if anyone has any feedbac

Tomcat performance patch (in development) to reduce concurrency...

Hi, I wonder if anyone has any feedback on a performance change that I am working on making. One benefit of reducing concurrency in a server application is that a small number of requests can complete more quickly than if they had to compete against a large number of running threads for object

WebappClassLoader patch for EBCDIC

Hi, I have prepared a patch to be able to use properties in native encoding. In EBCDIC Environment the FileInputStream is localized but not the ByteArrayInputStream therefore loading a properties using the WebappClassLoader class loader fails. Any comment before I commit the attached patch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7831] - [PATCH] JNDIRealm does not work with CLIENT-CERT auth method

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7831] - [PATCH] JNDIRealm does not work with CLIENT-CERT auth method

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: [PATCH] Jakarta-site-2

Yoav Shapira wrote: It's not your karma that's the issue ;) Jakarta-site2 was moved to SVN a while ago. It now lives at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/site. He he. Cool. It shows how much I'm committing to the documentation ;) I've applied a slightly modified vers

RE: [PATCH] Jakarta-site-2

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:04 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [PATCH] Jakarta-site-2 > > Hi, > Seems I'm missing the karma for jakarta-site-2. > Here is the patch for

[PATCH] Jakarta-site-2

Hi, Seems I'm missing the karma for jakarta-site-2. Here is the patch for sourceindex.xml I would be pleased if someone can spare a moment an commit those :). Regards, Mladen cvs diff -u -- sourceindex.xml (in directory C:\U\CVSUP\jakarta-site2\xdocs\site\) Index: sourceinde

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

|FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 12:24 --- Many thanks for the patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

to see it is to do an SSI include of a file containing a single character. When I do commit your patch, I intend to include the following changes unless you know of a reason not to: SSIServlet - Not deprecated. I'd like to give people the option. SSIFilter - Format changes for 80 char

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

a bit. There is one part of your patch I haven't yet worked out. In ResponseIncludeWrapper you have intercepted the last-modified and content-type headers. I understand why last-modified but not content-type. Can you explain please? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userpr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] Tomcat 5.X connectors SSL Accelerator proxy support

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dev Team, Attached is a patch to address the Tomcat 5.X inability to specify a secure proxy without an SSL connection. The goal is to specify secure="true", scheme="https", proxyPort="443", and proxyName="ssl-accelerator.domain.com"

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34272] - Patch to externalize the JspServlet Options implementation

|FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 11:59 --- I have applied the patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34272] - Patch to externalize the JspServlet Options implementation

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34272 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-04 00:52 --- It seems to add the original intended behavior of allowing plugging the options. I'll commit your patch tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cg

[PATCH] Tomcat 5.X connectors SSL Accelerator proxy support

Dev Team, Attached is a patch to address the Tomcat 5.X inability to specify a secure proxy without an SSL connection. The goal is to specify secure="true", scheme="https", proxyPort="443", and proxyName="ssl-accelerator.domain.com" on a plain HTTP Connec

[PATCH] Tomcat 5.X connectors SSL Accelerator proxy support

Dev Team, Attached is a patch to address the Tomcat 5.X inability to specify a secure proxy without an SSL connection. The goal is to specify secure="true", scheme="https", proxyPort="443", and proxyName="ssl-accelerator.domain.com" on a plain HTTP Connec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34272] - Patch to externalize the JspServlet Options implementation

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34272 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-02 08:25 --- Created an attachment (id=14608) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14608&action=view) Patch for engineOptionsClass option patch -- Configure bugmail: http://issu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34272] New: - Patch to externalize the JspServlet Options implementation

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34272 Summary: Patch to externalize the JspServlet Options implementation Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33106 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-27 14:10 --- I have reviewed the patch and have found one area I would like to see a change. The character encoding used to decode the query string has changed from platform default to UTF-8. Such a change is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34113] - [PATCH] setHeader( ) method in Response object does not clear multiple values

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34113] - [PATCH] setHeader( ) method in Response object does not clear multiple values

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33767] - [PATCH] Modification to FAQ for Remote Debugging with NetBeans IDE

|FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-23 16:53 --- Done. Thanks for submitting the patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watchi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33106] - SSI Processing Enhancements (patch provided)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33857] - Patch for tomcat documentation

|FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-23 17:27 --- Patch applied. Thanks for submitting it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are wa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34113] - [PATCH] setHeader( ) method in Response object does not clear multiple values

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34113 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 02:06 --- Created an attachment (id=14532) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14532&action=view) Patch to fix the setValue( ) method of MimeHeaders (on which Response's s

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >