Bill Barker wrote:
At least with the Solaris TCP stack, the SoTimeouts make no difference at
all to the 'ab' times. However, it's easy enough to make it a configuration
option.
Thanks for doing it :)
I don't know if it ends up impacting actual benchmarks (although it may
depend on the platform
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Optimizing Coyote
> I'm surprised at the expense: I had thought that this should be little
more
> than setting a note in the O/S kernel. It's also pretty much what
> Apache/httpd 2.0 does, at lea
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm surprised at the expense: I had thought that this should be little more
than setting a note in the O/S kernel. It's also pretty much what
Apache/httpd 2.0 does, at least last time I looked.
However, I'll take another look at them.
It's not *that* expensive, it's just th
y Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 AM
Subject: Optimizing Coyote
> Hi,
>
> Many optimizations in Coyote HTTP/1.1 are quite straightforward, but
> some others are more difficul
Hi,
Many optimizations in Coyote HTTP/1.1 are quite straightforward, but
some others are more difficult.
Right now, I'm "stuck" trying to optimize the amount of get/setSoTimeout
method calls. Each of them is relatively expensive, and probably ends up
exercizing the network stack more than we w
