2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:52:22 +0200
> > > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTED]>
> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: New branches and repositories
> >
> > So it looks like the vote result (nearly everyone who voted +1 to the
> > 5.0 proposal voted, and there's a clear majority for the winning
> > cho
;
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: New branches and repositories
>
> So it looks like the vote result (nearly everyone who voted +1 to the
> 5.0 proposal voted, and there's a clear majorit
Sorry for the late vote. I've been on vacation last two weeks. ;-)
>
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
>
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
>>De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Enviado el: 12 de julio de 2002 10:52
>
>
>>D) Use new jakarta-tomcat-5 (a root will need to create it)
>
>
> Rereading this threads about oganizating the tc-5 code, i think i dont
> understand which is suppoused to be
> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: 12 de julio de 2002 10:52
> D) Use new jakarta-tomcat-5 (a root will need to create it)
Rereading this threads about oganizating the tc-5 code, i think i dont
understand which is suppoused to be in the j-t-5 repo, Coyote 2.0 is the
co
So it looks like the vote result (nearly everyone who voted +1 to the
5.0 proposal voted, and there's a clear majority for the winning
choices) is:
A) Use new jakarta-servletapi-5 (a root will need to create it)
B) Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina (a root will need to create it)
C) Use HEAD of
>
>
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
>
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
> 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> 4. [ ] Other:
>
>
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
>
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
> 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> 4. [ ] Other:
>
>
>>A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
>>1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
>>2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
>>3. [ ] Other:
>>
>>B) Catalina 2.0
>>1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
>>2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
>>3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
>>4. [ ] Other:
>>
>>C) Co
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
>
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
> 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> 4. [ ] Other:
>
> C)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>D) Tomcat 5.0
>>1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
>>2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
>>3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat
>>4. [ ] Other:
>
>
> That's a hard one...
>
> I would like it to go in jakarta-tomcat, but the current CVS organization
> is a mess
A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
3. [ ] Other:
B) Catalina 2.0
1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
4. [ ] Other:
C) Coyote 2.0
1. [X] Yes, u
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AT&T IP Network Configuration & Provisioning Development
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories
On T
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
> 3. [ ] Use the HEAD
Remy,
Below are my votes. I like the idea of using repositories without
versions numbers for the Catalina, Jasper, and Tomcat code. It always
seemed to me to be a pain to create a new CVS repository every time
there is a new release instead of just creating a branch for the old
release.
Patr
Quoting Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
> 3. [ ] Use the HEAD
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> New repositories are needed to host the new Tomcat 5.0 code, including
> the new servlet & JSP API, Catalina, Coyote 2.0 and protocol handlers,
> Jasper.
>
> A) For the Servlet & JSP API, I think a new separate repository is
> needed (jakarta-servletapi-5 to follow the
>
>
> A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5
> 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi
> 3. [ ] Other:
>
> B) Catalina 2.0
> 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina
> 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0
> 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> 4. [ ] Other:
>
>
New repositories are needed to host the new Tomcat 5.0 code, including
the new servlet & JSP API, Catalina, Coyote 2.0 and protocol handlers,
Jasper.
A) For the Servlet & JSP API, I think a new separate repository is
needed (jakarta-servletapi-5 to follow the current conventions). Or we
could
20 matches
Mail list logo
