RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Nice... But the tarballs should be redone, should n't they? >Then how to know that a 4.0.2 tarballs (connectors) is a good one? >I would have retagged jakarta-tomcat-connectors as >tomcat_402_01 and will >rebuild the tarballs as jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.2-01-src.* > >Any comments? It seems

RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-13 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you ever see any commit (from me) that late in a release cycle - make > sure you -1 it, regardless of how usefull it may look. Peer review seems > to work well, but it needs more time. After half a billion commits you introduced a bug.

Re[2]: Native Connector problems

2002-02-13 Thread Jonathan Pierce
Where are the binary builds of the native connectors for 4.0.2? When can we expect them? Can you quantify the term "shortly"? Jonathan Reply Separator Subject:Re: Native Connector problems Author: "Tomcat Developers List" <

Re: Native Connector problems

2002-02-13 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > The problem is that the default cache size is one and in the ajp_init > > function > > in jk_ajp_common.c we return from inside of an if when we initialize > > the cache > > so the secrect member of the structure never gets initialized. This > > caused > > some GPFs i

Re: Native Connector problems

2002-02-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
> The problem is that the default cache size is one and in the ajp_init > function > in jk_ajp_common.c we return from inside of an if when we initialize > the cache > so the secrect member of the structure never gets initialized. This > caused > some GPFs in certain cases on some of my builds. >

Loadbalancer problems in mod_jk 4.0.3 [was Native Connector problems]

2002-02-13 Thread Hans Schmid
jk_uri_worker_map.c (447)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker Thanks a lot for looking into this, Best Regards, Hans -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Hans Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 08:23 An: Tomcat Developers List Betreff: AW: Native

AW: Native Connector problems

2002-02-12 Thread Hans Schmid
active most of the time. (by changing the lbvalue) Thanks, Hans > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 02:17 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: RE: Native Connector problems > > >

RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-12 Thread cmanolache
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Mike Anderson wrote: > The problem is that the default cache size is one and in the ajp_init The problem is that I spent too much time writing java code. I didn't see the return statement, the deep if() have confused me. If you ever see any commit (from me) that late in a

RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-12 Thread Mike Anderson
The problem is that the default cache size is one and in the ajp_init function in jk_ajp_common.c we return from inside of an if when we initialize the cache so the secrect member of the structure never gets initialized. This caused some GPFs in certain cases on some of my builds. I've checked i

RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>One of the last changes on the connector ( the secret ) >introduced a bug, >when worker_cache is enabled. The secret will not be initialized, and >that may creates all kind of serious problems. Could you detail the problem ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addition

Native Connector problems

2002-02-12 Thread costinm
Mea culpa... One of the last changes on the connector ( the secret ) introduced a bug, when worker_cache is enabled. The secret will not be initialized, and that may creates all kind of serious problems. Not sure what's the best solution ( not using cache_size will impact the performance ), bu