FW: [NAGOYA.APACHE.ORG] RSYNC Output

2002-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
irrors with a good 43 megabytes of downloads completely useless, and which costed I don't know how much (but a lot) to Collab.NET which is kindly paying for bandwidth! Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: Rsync Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 6 Sep 2002 12:00:31 -

Fw: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390

2002-01-04 Thread Bill Barker
Friday, January 04, 2002 7:39 PM Subject: Re: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390 > Yea... sort of works but nothing like 3.2.3. The classes that have been > called previously are still alive but any uncalled classes in the jar are > dead (404 error). And a resta

Re: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390

2001-12-25 Thread Bill Barker
;Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 8:13 PM Subject: Re: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390 > Hi Bill, > > Gee, it's xmas eve and we're pounding on the keyboard. Hahaha - or should I > say Hohoho. > > I attached the

Re: Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-04 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/4/01 9:33 AM, "Pier P. Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The best thing to do is to upgrade to the new version of BugZilla... I just > downloaded it and will install it on my Dover box tonight, and if everything > goes smooth, it'll be on nagoya next week... (The only problem is that I

Re: Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-04 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
current and well utilized bug tracking system. > > Justy > > - Original Message - >> on 5/3/01 11:42 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ >> >> <http://nagoya.apache.o

Re: Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-03 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/3/01 4:20 PM, "horwat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When is Scarab coming out? I'd like an alternative instead of simply hearing > complaints about the current and well utilized bug tracking system. > > Justy Actually, Scarab is back on the high track within CollabNet now that SourceCast 1

Re: Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-03 Thread horwat
- > on 5/3/01 11:42 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ > > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/globals.pl> > > When is someone going to secure that box? > > This is really pitiful that

Re: Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-03 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/3/01 2:19 PM, "Nick Bauman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A while ago I tried to run bugzilla in a chroot jail using thttpd (apache no > longer supports chroot'ing, it seems). I got it somewhat working, but I gave > up and went to bugrat, for better or worse. > > I think if you can chroot (a

Re: Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-03 Thread Nick Bauman
urity implications you've seen. Without chrooting and running as an unprivledged user, bugzilla is not only insecure, it's insecurable. > on 5/3/01 11:42 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ > &

Nagoya.apache.org

2001-05-03 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/3/01 11:42 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/globals.pl> When is someone going to secure that box? This is really pitiful that this has been open like this for this long no