RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-04-02 Thread costinm
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> Thank Constin,that really helped. Are there any > >> advantages of WARP over APJ? I mean why would I want > >> to use one over the other? The protocol difference is not significant - both are encoding strings and ints in an efficient ( but non-standard

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-04-02 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"James Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I gladly will (or have done), in fact I've rewritten mod_webapp which > resolves the common complains: > > 1) How can I get Apache to serve static content and Tomcat dynamic content Good... Patch... > 2) 404 Apache errors When Tomcat is started

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-04-02 Thread James Williamson
> "James Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Umm, I posted a bug about this, what about the now infamous 404 (Apache > > started after Tomcat issue) and the fact that the manager app doesn't work > > when you try to create a new application due to apache indexing the apps when > > it sta

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-04-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Thank Constin,that really helped. Are there any >> advantages of WARP over APJ? I mean why would I want >> to use one over the other? I could tell you that packet encoding in ajp13 and warp is very similar. Did there is advantages to use warp over ajp ? Hard to tell but the question is elsew

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-04-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"James Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Umm, I posted a bug about this, what about the now infamous 404 (Apache > started after Tomcat issue) and the fact that the manager app doesn't work > when you try to create a new application due to apache indexing the apps when > it starts. The onl

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-04-01 Thread James Williamson
> David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the pointer on that documentation. I was wondering where the > > Javadoc style comments were being used at. > > You welcome... > > > I still don't think the question was really answered though as to the > > motivation of mod_webapp versus

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-29 Thread costinm
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Sam Ewing wrote: > Thank Constin,that really helped. Are there any > advantages of WARP over APJ? I mean why would I want > to use one over the other? I have no idea :-) If you care how strings and ints are encoded, or what's the packet structure probably you would pick one.

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-29 Thread costinm
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Sam Ewing wrote: > Hi Costin, > > > - mod_jserv implements ajp12 > > - mod_jk implements ajp12, ajp13, jni > > - mod_jk2 implements ajp13 ( and one of my goals for > > I looked at > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/ajp.html > > This says that "This im

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-29 Thread Sam Ewing
Hi Costin, > - mod_jserv implements ajp12 > - mod_jk implements ajp12, ajp13, jni > - mod_jk2 implements ajp13 ( and one of my goals for I looked at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/ajp.html This says that "This implementation supports the AJP 1.3 and 1.4 protocols".. __

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-29 Thread Sam Ewing
Thank Constin,that really helped. Are there any advantages of WARP over APJ? I mean why would I want to use one over the other? Sam --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Maybe I've not kept up on the docs enough but ... > > > > I do think this threa

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 00:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I do think this thread, highlights a general confusion around tomcat. > Over the last couple of years, there have been many > mod_jk/jk2/webapp/warp/?? implementations, ajp versions etc, and even > when the discussions are on the list, it

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread costinm
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Maybe I've not kept up on the docs enough but ... > > I do think this thread, highlights a general confusion around tomcat. > Over the last couple of years, there have been many > mod_jk/jk2/webapp/warp/?? implementations, ajp versions etc, and e

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:11 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp > > >Maybe I've not kept up on the docs enough but ... > >I

RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread Ken . Horn
f features, config, performance, load balancing, web servers supported, whether still in development etc. -Original Message- From: pier Sent: 28 March 2002 12:52 To: tomcat-dev Cc: pier Subject: Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the pointer on that documentation. I was wondering where the > Javadoc style comments were being used at. You welcome... > I still don't think the question was really answered though as to the > motivation of mod_webapp versus mod_jk/mod_jk2

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread David Graff
made available to the public so that we understand what the spawned these two different integration modules? Thanks. -dave - Original Message - From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 2

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mod_webapp (from what I can tell) was supposed to be a completely new > implemenation of this functionality with improvements here and there as far > as application deployment etc. FWIW, mod_webapp works perfectly for what concerns my needs, and all the d

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-27 Thread costinm
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > mod_jk2 is the next generation of mod_jk. It is currently barely Alpha > quality for Apache 2.x (and still subject to major changes from day-to-day), It works ( barely :-) with Apache2.x and 1.3. The connector for apache1.3 can be used as a basis for u

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-27 Thread Bill Barker
g" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:00 PM Subject: Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp > Thanks. Do you have any info about configuring Tomcat > w/ Apache using mod_webapp? I couldn't find anythin

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-27 Thread Sam Ewing
ing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 00:49 > Subject: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp > > > > > > I was not able to locate any information on the > > differences between mod_webapp and mod_jk for > Tomcat &

Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-27 Thread David Graff
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 00:49 Subject: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp > > I was not able to locate any information on the > differences between mod_webapp and mod_jk for Tomcat > 4.0.. could anyone point me in the right direction? > What about the respective protoc

Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp

2002-03-27 Thread Sam Ewing
I was not able to locate any information on the differences between mod_webapp and mod_jk for Tomcat 4.0.. could anyone point me in the right direction? What about the respective protocols? APJ v/s WARP? Also, where could I find instructions on configuring apache to use mod_webapp? Any reply wo