Hi Mathias,
a looked at your patch and I think there are two bugs:
1) You set in_recovering of a woker which is in error_state to JK_TRUE even if
you don't select him for handling the request. This should be moved into the
next if clause when the worker is choosen.
2) When a local/main worker g
Here is my patch to the load balancing code. I have tested the jk1
part but not the jk2. The behavior should be identical though.
The concept of local worker is introduced. Local workers form a subset
of the balanced workers, those workers handle the requests with no
session information
Hi again,
included int this message is a patch to the current CVS which adds the
notion of local workers to both jk1 and jk2.
I did not have time to test the patch, I can only say it does compile.
The modifications are rather slim so the validation should be easy.
Feedback welcome,
Mathias.
