RE: License files error - PMC Approval Required

2003-12-24 Thread Rodney Waldhoff
(Trimming licensing from the to list, as prompted by Greg Stein) On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Mark Thomas wrote: > OK. The patch files have all been attached to the bug report at > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10286 > > Once I get the OK from the PMC I will commit them. +1 from me.

RE: License files error - PMC Approval Required

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Thomas
OK. The patch files have all been attached to the bug report at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10286 Once I get the OK from the PMC I will commit them. Mark On Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:21 PM, Mark Thomas [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Will do. I'll start preparing the

RE: License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Thomas
Will do. I'll start preparing the patches now. Mark On Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:23 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > A lot of the license files in tomcat have the following lines: > > > > * 1. Redistributions of sour

RE: License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Mark Thomas wrote: > A lot of the license files in tomcat have the following lines: > > * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice * > *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * > > Note that "notice" appe

Re: License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Tim Funk
Files in question: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/LICENSE?rev=1.4&view=auto http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-5/LICENSE?rev=1.1.1.1&view=auto Looking at CVS, it looks like some other jakarta projects have also had (differenet) typo problems and also fixed their

RE: License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Thomas
A lot of the license files in tomcat have the following lines: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice * *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Note that "notice" appears at the end of the first line as well as the begi

Re: License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Mark Thomas wrote: > them with the official version (http://www.apache.org/LICENSE)? I ask since I > don't want to change the license file in case there are any legal > complications. I can't see why there would be but you never know - better safe > than sorry ;) You bet :-

RE: License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
2003 1:00 PM >To: Tomcat-Dev (E-mail) >Subject: License files error > >Resending using my apache e-mail address. Sorry for the duplicate mail. > >All, > >There is a small grammatical error in most (all?) of the license files in >various tomcat CVS repositories as described i

License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Thomas
Resending using my apache e-mail address. Sorry for the duplicate mail. All, There is a small grammatical error in most (all?) of the license files in various tomcat CVS repositories as described in http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10286. Does anyone have any objection to me e

License files error

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Thomas
All, There is a small grammatical error in most (all?) of the license files in various tomcat CVS repositories as described in http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10286. Does anyone have any objection to me editing the tomcat license files to align them with the official version