I love your flaming reaction Craig. You are trying to justify two wrongs
making a right or something.
on 9/18/01 9:09 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming from someone who bragged (at his ApacheCon London session on Turbine)
> about not caring about violating license agr
on 9/18/01 2:31 AM, "Brian Behlendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
>> There is no way in hell that I'm going agree to put the ASF (or myself) in a
>> position to take responsibility for any legal claims that come up as a
>> result of use of this .jar file.
ED]>,
> Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Ldap.jar license
>
> -1
>
> I do not agree to this license for inclusion of ldap.jar in Tomcat 4.0
> final.
>
> 124 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jon wheel 123717 Sep 17 19:36 ldap.jar
>
> This is a s
Jon Stevens wrote:
> -1
>
> I do not agree to this license for inclusion of ldap.jar in Tomcat 4.0
> final.
>
> 124 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jon wheel 123717 Sep 17 19:36 ldap.jar
>
> This is a similar license to the old Servlet API 2.0 license and I never
> agreed to that one for inclusion in J
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> There is no way in hell that I'm going agree to put the ASF (or myself) in a
> position to take responsibility for any legal claims that come up as a
> result of use of this .jar file. Carefully read supplemental section #2 (v).
Commenting here without su
-1
I do not agree to this license for inclusion of ldap.jar in Tomcat 4.0
final.
124 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jon wheel 123717 Sep 17 19:36 ldap.jar
This is a similar license to the old Servlet API 2.0 license and I never
agreed to that one for inclusion in Jserv on pretty much the same issues
