DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28393] - Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing.

2004-04-14 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28393 Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28393] - Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing.

2004-04-14 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28393 Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing. --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-14 21:02 --- Created an attachment (id=11243) The edited file - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28393] - Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing.

2004-04-14 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28393 Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing. --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-14 21:01 --- Created an attachment (id=11242) Diff of my changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28393] New: - Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing.

2004-04-14 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28393 Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing. Summary: Patch for JK2 docs about load balanceing. Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.1.29 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Enhan

Need help creating a JK2 Docs Patch

2004-04-09 Thread Angus Mezick
I am trying to figure out this JK2 load balancing code and fix the docs. I need some help verifying some of the coding decisions that have been made. Ok, as I dig deeper into the code, I discover the following: Both worker:AJP13 and channel.socket can have both the level and lb_factor parameters T

Re: [PATCH] [JK2 docs] Minor patch to jk2 docs

2002-09-25 Thread Eugene Gluzberg
Can anyone check this in? Eugene Gluzberg wrote: > Just some additional installation info. > > > > > Index: jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml > === > RCS file: /hom

[PATCH] [JK2 docs] Minor patch to jk2 docs

2002-09-23 Thread Eugene Gluzberg
Just some additional installation info. Index: jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -c -r1.6 configweb.xml *** jk/xdocs/jk2/conf

RE: Jk2 docs

2002-03-22 Thread costinm
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >I documented 2 properties, to be used to override the default > >when new protocols/apis are added: > > > > channel.socket.local.protocol=ajp13 ( it could be WARP, or IIOP or RPC ) > > ok, that's what I looked for > > > channel.socket.local.api=ajp13 (

RE: Jk2 docs

2002-03-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> channel.socket.local.type=ajp13 ? > >No :-) > >The only protocol that we support in Jk at this moment is the >ajp13 protocol ( lb, status, etc are workers, but not protocols ), >so it is the default and users don't have to set it explicitely. > >I documented 2 properties, to be used to override

RE: Jk2 docs

2002-03-22 Thread costinm
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >channel.socket.local.port=8009 > >channel.socket.local.lbfactor=1 > >channel.socket.local.secretkey=... > > good, a channel indicate transport, > a worker should be a layer upper, it use a channel > for transport and channel could be virtual (ie lb)

RE: Jk2 docs

2002-03-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>What the user most define are the communication channels ( host, port, >etc ). It is far cleaner to set the properties on the channel and use >defaults for the handler. > >Henri - is this solution acceptable ? > >That means: > >channel.socket.local.port=8009 >channel.socket.local.lbfactor=1 >ch

Jk2 docs

2002-03-22 Thread costinm
Hi, I just checked in 2 docs for jk2, one describing the general model and one start of the config manual. It's obviously subject to change. I think I found a solution to address Henri's comments about worker/channel configuration - that is to reverse things. "Worker" is an extremely confus