RE: Jk and APR

2001-11-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> No, I am not using a Gnu make - But I will: you convince me :) > >Would it be ok if we make Gnu make a requirement for the build system ? >There are many cool feature that would make building much easier ( >patterns, globs, etc ). +1, even AS/400 has a gnu make :) >After we start using APR I

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-29 Thread costinm
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > No, I am not using a Gnu make - But I will: you convince me :) Would it be ok if we make Gnu make a requirement for the build system ? There are many cool feature that would make building much easier ( patterns, globs, etc ). After we start usin

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-27 Thread jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > > > Excellent, we should give a way to user to fall back to OS calls if they > > > could find an APR installed. > > > > I am not sure about that, APR should hide all OS calls. Mixing APR and OS calls > > is possible

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-27 Thread costinm
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Excellent, we should give a way to user to fall back to OS calls if they > > could find an APR installed. > > I am not sure about that, APR should hide all OS calls. Mixing APR and OS calls > is possible but probably not very safe. Not mixing -

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-27 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >> I would even use APR to build mod_jk: APR of httpd-2.0 > >(installed or source) > >> otherwise the one given by --with-apr parameter with > >configuring mod_jk :) > > Ok, we should be carefull with apr, since I've got many > problems using it with mod_webapp when creati

RE: Jk and APR

2001-11-26 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> I would even use APR to build mod_jk: APR of httpd-2.0 >(installed or source) >> otherwise the one given by --with-apr parameter with >configuring mod_jk :) Ok, we should be carefull with apr, since I've got many problems using it with mod_webapp when creating library libwebapp. I wasn't abl

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-26 Thread costinm
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > I would even use APR to build mod_jk: APR of httpd-2.0 (installed or source) > otherwise the one given by --with-apr parameter with configuring mod_jk :) I'll go ahead and create an APR directory. To keep things simple and clear I'll not touch

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This has been discussed many times, and the only conclusion was that we > should and will change mod_jk to use APR, but no clear plans were decided. > > My proposal is quite simple and require minimal code change. Mod_jk > consist of a number of interfaces. We alread

Re: Jk and APR

2001-11-21 Thread Gomez Henri
En réponse à [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 I know somebody who will be happy with that. But we should be carefull with APR. We could use the one from Apache 2.0 when mod_jk is compiled against AP2. What should we use when compiling against Apache 1.3 or IIS, NES ? JF Clere will give us here preciou

Jk and APR

2001-11-21 Thread cmanolache
This has been discussed many times, and the only conclusion was that we should and will change mod_jk to use APR, but no clear plans were decided. My proposal is quite simple and require minimal code change. Mod_jk consist of a number of interfaces. We already added a channel interface that will