Amy Roh wrote:
> If you need new additions and fixes in JMX1.2, then switching to 1.2
> sounds
> good to me. What other changes are needed to make it work with JMX1.2? I
> can volunteer to make the changes (especially in mbeans-descriptors.xml)
> if you point me to the list of changes.
The bui
> You may have noticed - tomcat doesn't work with JMX 1.2
> The main problem is that the spec now requires the type to be
> JNI-style ( [Ljava.lang.String; instead of java.lang.String[] ).
> That would require a change in mbeans-descriptos.xml - but I'm
> not sure if mx4j would still work after tha
Costin Manolache wrote:
You may have noticed - tomcat doesn't work with JMX 1.2
The main problem is that the spec now requires the type to be
JNI-style ( [Ljava.lang.String; instead of java.lang.String[] ).
That would require a change in mbeans-descriptos.xml - but I'm
not sure if mx4j would stil
You may have noticed - tomcat doesn't work with JMX 1.2
The main problem is that the spec now requires the type to be
JNI-style ( [Ljava.lang.String; instead of java.lang.String[] ).
That would require a change in mbeans-descriptos.xml - but I'm
not sure if mx4j would still work after that.
There
