27;tomcat.gif' is too small to
> for Tomcat to use sendfile by default).
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List"
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Initial apr r
: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: Initial apr results
Excellent. In my future tests, I'll keep the concurrency lower and the
hits higher. I'll also use different size files. I am only able to use a
1.4.2 JVM. I might be able to get 1.
Excellent. In my future tests, I'll keep the concurrency lower and the hits
higher. I'll also use different size files. I am only able to use a 1.4.2
JVM. I might be able to get 1.5 on - but its highly doubtful.
-Tim
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1
Tim Funk wrote:
My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1000-44 - Dual CPU (440 MHz)
On my initial tests with the APR connector - the APR connector "seemed"
slower the "old" http connector. But the difference is mild and my
initial numbers are flaky. On the same hardware - I am running 6 other
ins
once I finally get the APR build working on my laptop, I will run my
benchmarks and publish the results.
peter
On 6/1/05, Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1000-44 - Dual CPU (440 MHz)
>
> On my initial tests with the APR connector - the APR connector "seem
My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1000-44 - Dual CPU (440 MHz)
On my initial tests with the APR connector - the APR connector "seemed"
slower the "old" http connector. But the difference is mild and my initial
numbers are flaky. On the same hardware - I am running 6 other instances (of
differ
