Thanks for the encouragement, Costin. I'll give it a shot and let you
know if I run into something I don't understand.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2001, Bruce Butterfield wrote:
>
>>What would be the major issue of adding HTTP 1.1 capability to Tomcat
>>3.2.x? Our application uses
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Bruce Butterfield wrote:
> What would be the major issue of adding HTTP 1.1 capability to Tomcat
> 3.2.x? Our application uses Tomcat standalone because there is almost no
> static content and thus using the Apache server seems superfluous. We
> expose SOAP-like APIs to th
What would be the major issue of adding HTTP 1.1 capability to Tomcat
3.2.x? Our application uses Tomcat standalone because there is almost no
static content and thus using the Apache server seems superfluous. We
expose SOAP-like APIs to the application and performance would certainly
get a bo
