Re: Gump failures

2002-06-27 Thread costinm
There is also a 4th option - cheat gump :-) Remove the declared dependency on mx4j and use the binary distribution on mx4j ( just like we do for jsse for example ). At least temporary. Costin On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > > The TC nightly build

Re: Gump failures

2002-06-27 Thread Remy Maucherat
> Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of > > MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be > > found. > > Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without deprecation. > MX4J still uses the old

Re: Gump failures

2002-06-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without > deprecation. MX4J still uses the old names. > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> Is someone trying to fix it ? > > Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this. I opened a problem report

Re: Gump failures

2002-06-26 Thread Sam Ruby
Remy Maucherat wrote: > > The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of > MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be > found. Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without deprecation. MX4J still uses the old names. > I

Gump failures

2002-06-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi Sam, The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be found. Is someone trying to fix it ? So far, Gump has failed to generate a single nightly for TC 4.1. That's not too good :-( Remy -- T