Re: FW: JK 1.2.7 Problem?

2004-12-17 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 05:51 AM 12/14/2004, Allistair Crossley wrote: Copying in DEV on this JK issue/solution on Mladen's request. The release build worked fine. Seems that the problem is caused by the fact that beta3 binaries are compiled as 'debug' so tolower function is issuing an

Re: FW: JK 1.2.7 Problem?

2004-12-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 05:51 AM 12/14/2004, Allistair Crossley wrote: >Copying in DEV on this JK issue/solution on Mladen's request. The release >build worked fine. > >Seems that the problem is caused by the fact that beta3 binaries >are compiled as 'debug' so tolower function is issuing an assertion. > >I'll mak

FW: JK 1.2.7 Problem?

2004-12-13 Thread Allistair Crossley
Copying in DEV on this JK issue/solution on Mladen's request. The release build worked fine. Allistair. > Mladen Whow! Seems that the problem is caused by the fact that beta3 binaries are compiled as 'debug' so tolower function is issuing an assertion. I'll make a release build and sent it to

RE: FW: Building isapi_redirector2.dll Win32 Release

2004-11-11 Thread Derrick Koes
, November 08, 2004 10:50 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: FW: Building isapi_redirector2.dll Win32 Release Derrick Koes wrote: > > > I *may* be able to fix some of the errors with jk_isapi_plugin.c > myself, but does anyone know where pcre.h exists? Yes, I know about >

Fw: Multi-Site Clustering? (hot failover)

2004-11-10 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev
- Original Message - From: "Peter Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I should add that some service provider include it free, if you rent rack space in the other hosting facility. I've used Level3 in the past and I know they definitely provide multi-site load balancing. all of the top 3 service p

RE: FW: Building isapi_redirector2.dll Win32 Release

2004-11-09 Thread Derrick Koes
Yes, I get it, but many of us use it. Any chance we'll get a dll more recent than March 26th? Thanks, Derrick -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:50 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: FW: Bui

Re: FW: Building isapi_redirector2.dll Win32 Release

2004-11-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Derrick Koes wrote: I *may* be able to fix some of the errors with jk_isapi_plugin.c myself, but does anyone know where pcre.h exists? Yes, I know about M. Turk's dll http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/, but I'd like to be able to build the fix myself. Hi Derrick, JK2 is officially unsupported. R

FW: Building isapi_redirector2.dll Win32 Release

2004-11-08 Thread Derrick Koes
"Re"-post from user list. -Original Message- From: Derrick Koes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tim Lucia Subject: Building isapi_redirector2.dll Win32 Release I pulled the latest from CVS yesterday (11/02/04) and I think

FW: 5.0.29 JSP compilation fails when using JDK 1.5.0

2004-10-22 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Oops, copying the list on this message, sent just to Jess by accident. Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com >-Original Message- >From: Shapira, Yoav >Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 12:52 PM >To: 'Jess Holle' >Subject: RE: 5.0.29 JSP compilation fails when using JDK 1.5.0 > >Hi, >I've

FW: [PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-4 - Update to Apache License V2 - Part 2 of 4

2004-08-29 Thread Mark Thomas
Sorry had to split this patch as it was rejected for being too big. Part 2b is attached. Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 8:28 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: [PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-4 - Update to Apache Lice

FW: [PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-4 - Update to Apache License V2 - Part 2 of 4

2004-08-29 Thread Mark Thomas
Sorry had to split this patch as it was rejected for being too big. Part 2a is attached. Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 8:28 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: [PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-4 - Update to Apache Licen

FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler (2 of 2)

2004-08-25 Thread Mark Thomas
The original commit message failed. 1.4.2.7 +13 -58 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeCon text.java Index: JspRuntimeContext.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-jasper/j

FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler (1 of 2)

2004-08-25 Thread Mark Thomas
The original commit message failed. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler BeanRepository.java Collector.java Compiler.java DefaultErrorHandler.java Dumper.java ErrorDispatcher.java ErrorHandler.java Ge

Re: Fw: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/proxy proxy_util.c

2004-08-09 Thread Mladen Turk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: REMOVE MY NAME FROM THIS MAILING LIST IMMEDIATELY ! DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY CONTROL OF YOUR MAILING LISTS ??? First of all it's not my list :-). Second read the documentation how to unsubscribe from the developers list on the jakarta site

FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Protocol.java

2004-05-27 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Yoav, you might want to remove this. Thanks, Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Protocol.java

Fw:'''~~movie'''~~25

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: }>Fucking<{

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: }>Fucking<{

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw:'''~~movie'''~~25

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: `·.¸MPEG`·.¸

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: `·.¸MPEG`·.¸

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: Lesbian Mpeg

2004-04-27 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw:'''~~movie'''~~25

2004-04-26 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: Funny Ass

2004-04-26 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: Lesbian & gays Mpeg

2004-04-15 Thread shachor
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin catalina.sh

2004-03-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Will do. Thanks. Mark From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mark Thomas wrote: > > Please can one of the moderators remove this address from > the tomcat-dev mailing > > list. > > When there's a problem on the list, usually the best is to mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Rémy

Re: FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin catalina.sh

2004-03-14 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: Please can one of the moderators remove this address from the tomcat-dev mailing list. When there's a problem on the list, usually the best is to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin catalina.sh

2004-03-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Please can one of the moderators remove this address from the tomcat-dev mailing list. Thanks, Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 5:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/b

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
HI, >Ok, two have gone. >I'm sending you the header's of the rest two I receive. > > >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good, we're making progress. I've booted [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] off tomcat-dev, in addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I unsubscribed earlier. Hopefully you'll

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: Shapira, Yoav > > Nonetheless, I've sent new unsubscribe instructions to the > above three addresses, which I can do as a moderator for > tomcat-dev. Try sending a message to this list in a few > minutes and see if you still get all three responses, or i

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Mladen Turk
> From: Guenter Knauf > I dont use a > SPAM mailer such as Outlook; so chances that a worm has > subscribed to one of those lists from my machine is == 0. :-). > In addition I believe that many do just the same as I: they > have a separate account for list post, and a white list which > o

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > There are a variety of causes. We've seen a great increase in the > number of 'smart' spam mailers than can subscribe themselves to our > lists. Accordingly, the amount of things like the above has increased. > The fact that only you get these three messages suggest it's your > computer or

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, >In fact I'm receiving tree mails on each post i make (_very_ annoying ). > >1. Thank you for your enquiry or message. (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >2. Dear PC Mechanic Supporter, (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >3. Thank you for your email to The Bridal Shop. (from >[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >The second one

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Mladen Turk
> From: Jeff Tulley > > This has happened to a few people in the last few months. > Whomever from radgametools that is subscribed here needs to > unsubscribe out of curteousy to the rest of the group, or > subscribe on of these "accepted" > addresses they list. > In fact I'm receiving tree

Re: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Jeff Tulley
This has happened to a few people in the last few months. Whomever from radgametools that is subscribed here needs to unsubscribe out of curteousy to the rest of the group, or subscribe on of these "accepted" addresses they list. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/27/04 6:33:38 AM >>> Anyone has a clue wh

[OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

2004-02-27 Thread Mladen Turk
Anyone has a clue why I'm receiving this on each mail send to this group? > -Original Message- > From: Autoresponder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Please update your email address... > > Reply-To: Autoresponder <[

Fw: CLAs : Deadline is March 1, 2004 to avoid suspension of commit privs

2004-02-24 Thread Bill Barker
It seems that there are still a handful of active Tomcat committers that this applies to. - Original Message - From: "Geir Magnusson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 3:25 PM Subject: CLAs : Deadline is March 1, 2004 to a

[Site] FW: broken link

2004-02-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, This was brought to my attention before the weekend. The link is indeed broken, and I thought it'd be a simple fix but I don't see an obvious replacement in CVS. Is README.TXT gone? Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-Original Message- >From: Ankur Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Fw: SSI and isVirtualWebappRelative in Tomcat 5.0.18

2004-02-16 Thread Ferran Orsola
Hi, I have been trying to use SSI in Tomcat. It seems that work perfectly but only using relative path. If I change isVirtualWebappRelative = 0 in order to use absolute path from root context, SSI don't work. When I use absolute path I only could include content from the same folder. My case

Fw: [PATCH] Clustering members using UDP sockets instead of multicast ones

2004-01-27 Thread Filip Hanik
- Original Message - From: "Filip Hanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clustering members using UDP sockets instead of multicast ones > I agree with you. But instead of extending multicas

FW: Please update your email address...

2003-12-10 Thread Mark Thomas
Could someone with control of the mailing list remove the addresses below from the list. Thanks, Mark We're sorry, but the RAD general email addresses have changed recently (to slow the flood of spam ). Please use one of these addresses instead: Sales: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RAD Video Tools Sup

FW: Tomcat 5 - jndi problem - Can someone of the developers help me ???

2003-12-10 Thread Frank Renaers
> -Original Message- > From: Frank Renaers > Sent: woensdag 10 december 2003 12:04 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Tomcat 5 - jndi problem > > Hi, > > Is it possible to browse the Tomcat jndi context from within another vm. > I wrote a small junit test to test thi

Fw: TOMCAT-fix for os/390??

2003-10-31 Thread Anna Fuhrmann
- Original Message - From: "Anna Fuhrmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Clere, Jean-Frederic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:07 PM Subject: Re: TOMCAT-fix for os/390?? > what I get is normal ascii - but then I left everyth

FW: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-03 Thread Cox, Charlie
for some reason this didn't get through to the list yesterday. If you get this twice, I apologize Charlie -Original Message- From: Cox, Charlie Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:12 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: [next] What's next ? > -Original Message- > From:

Re: FW: tomcat binary page links not up

2003-09-27 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: FYI There is really something wrong. I have clicked in the page http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html and the links are giving something like: +++ Not Found The requested URL /site/[preferred]/jakarta/taglibs/ was

Re: FW: tomcat binary page links not up

2003-09-27 Thread Remy Maucherat
jean-frederic clere wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: FYI There is really something wrong. I have clicked in the page http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html and the links are giving something like: +++ Not Found The requested URL /site/[preferred]/jakarta/taglibs/ was not found on this serv

Re: FW: tomcat binary page links not up

2003-09-27 Thread jean-frederic clere
Pier Fumagalli wrote: FYI There is really something wrong. I have clicked in the page http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html and the links are giving something like: +++ Not Found The requested URL /site/[preferred]/jakarta/taglibs/ was not found on this server. Apache/2.0.48-dev (Unix) Se

FW: tomcat binary page links not up

2003-09-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI -- Forwarded Message > From: Michael Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:46:52 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat binary page links not up > > Webmaster, > > I'm trying to download a tomcat file on the following page: > > http

Re: FW: Downloading Tomcat 4.06

2003-09-15 Thread Remy Maucherat
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Getting lots of those lately... Might want to check the website. (It's not mirrored) It's a legacy release, which is properly linked off the other releases page. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

FW: Downloading Tomcat 4.06

2003-09-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Getting lots of those lately... Might want to check the website. (It's not mirrored) Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Tye, Rebecca A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:48:16 -0400 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Downloading Tomcat 4.06 > > Where's the link to downloa

FW: MBeanServer problem

2003-08-20 Thread Adi Katz
Hello, I hope I post this in the right place. When restating a context in tomcat 4.1.24 the ServletContext lose the reference to the MBeanServer instance. The ServerLifeCycleListener set an attribute named 'org.apache.catalina.MBeanServer' in the ServletContext when tomcat starts up but once a

Fw: [Apache Newsletter Draft] News on Jakarta in July, 2003

2003-08-01 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
Dear Jakarta Tomcat Development Team, (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/) Hello, I am now in the process of preparing the first all-Apache-wide newsletter. http://www.apache.org/newsletter/ Please feel free to write statement/comment etc. to the Apache Newsletter (Issue 1) using ApacheWiki or

FW: JDK 1.4.2 and class loading

2003-08-01 Thread Danny Angus
I wonder if any tomcat guys have any insight they could share with us... > -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 August 2003 20:02 > To: James-Dev Mailing List > Cc: Ted Neward; Jeroen Frijters > Subject: JDK 1.4.2 and class loading > > > Apparent

FW: Reg Tomcat 4.1.18 Tags

2003-07-05 Thread srujana
-Original Message- From: srujana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 5:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reg Tomcat 4.1.18 Tags Hi Am getting problem with Tags/taglibs in Tomcat 4.1.x release. I'm using a bean and one tag(user

Re: Fw: Howto compile mod_jk2 under windows?

2003-06-30 Thread Laurent Blume
Here is a small explanation on how I managed to do it myself. I spent a while looking for detailed documentation with no success. If you find anything better, please keep me informed :-) HTH, Laurent --- Begin Message --- Laurent Blume wrote: No, it's part of Tomcat, and I think the most relevant

Fw: Howto compile mod_jk2 under windows?

2003-06-27 Thread Ares Liu
Hello gurus, This question I asked on Tomcat user list, But they let me ask it here. Who can help me please? -Ares - Original Message - From: "Ares Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: Howto compile mod_jk2

FW: Rotating catalina.out.

2003-06-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, I just posted this to the tomcat-user mailing list. Over there, several users now and in the past have asked for the catalina.out (tomcat's default System.out / System.err destination) file to be rotated on a regular basis. One person suggested using Apache's rotatelogs (http://httpd.apac

FW: JSPC for TOMCAT 4.124 generates unexpected "internal error"

2003-04-04 Thread Dufresne, Marc
> I'm doing a simple test to compile the checkbox JSP from the TOMCAT examples with > the -webinc switch > The JAVA and XML files are properly generates but jasper complains (unexpectedly ) > that the web.xml file is no found > here is the output fragment: > 2003-04-04 04:21:34 - uriRoot impli

FW: Files missing from website - webapp module builds

2003-04-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked. Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: Bruce Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:13:35 -0600 > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Files missing from w

FW: broken

2003-04-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Vijaya Dasari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:18:26 +0100 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: broken > > Hi, > The link > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/coyote/jk2/index.html > is broken. > Thanks, > Vijaya

Re: FW: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector

2003-03-24 Thread Henri Gomez
-- Forwarded Message From: Tony Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:33:01 -0800 (PST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector As followup to my previous note, I have contacted redhatLinux, and found that their version of Apache for linux8.0 profes

Re: FW: Poor documentation for jk

2003-03-24 Thread Henri Gomez
-- Forwarded Message From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Poor documentation for jk Hi Webmaster, I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's sayi

Re: FW: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector

2003-03-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Not acked... -- Forwarded Message From: Tony Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:33:01 -0800 (PST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector As followup to my previous note, I have contacted redhatLinux, and found that their v

Re: FW: Poor documentation for jk

2003-03-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, The doc could be found at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html Cheers Jean-frederic Pier Fumagalli wrote: Not acked -- Forwarded Message From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Poor documentation fo

FW: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector

2003-03-21 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... -- Forwarded Message > From: Tony Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:33:01 -0800 (PST) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fwd: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector > > As followup to my previous note, I have contacted redhatLinux, and found that > their version o

FW: Poor documentation for jk

2003-03-21 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked -- Forwarded Message > From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Poor documentation for jk > > Hi Webmaster, > I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the > jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is

Fw: Is JK2 via ajp13 MT-safe

2003-03-06 Thread Jorge Alonso de Armiño Escudero
- Mensaje original - De: "Jorge Alonso de Armiño Escudero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enviado: jueves 6 de marzo de 2003 11:04 Asunto: Fw: Is JK2 via ajp13 MT-safe > > - Mensaje original - > De: "Jorge Alonso de Armiño

Fw: Is JK2 via ajp13 MT-safe

2003-03-06 Thread Jorge Alonso de Armiño Escudero
- Mensaje original - De: "Jorge Alonso de Armiño Escudero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enviado: jueves 6 de marzo de 2003 9:48 Asunto: Re: Is JK2 via ajp13 MT-safe > Thanks Henri for your answer. > > The tests that we are doing are under Debian Woody Linux, kernel 2.4.2

FW: input validation of Tomcat admin tool not working

2003-02-11 Thread fangfang cai
Hi, Is anyone experienced this before and can give me a clue? I am trying to add a new user or define a new role with Tomcat Web Administration Tool. If you enter the non-valid input(s) (i.e. empty user name or have a quote in password), the exception error messages will be returned. The input

FW: openprojects.net name change

2003-01-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI, not acked -- Forwarded Message > From: Rob Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:08:50 -0600 (CST) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Rob Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: openprojects.net name change > > Today (Jan 30, 2003) at 01:05 -0600, Rob Levin wrote: > >> To th

FW: JMX : Questions

2003-01-27 Thread Thierry Legrain
-Original Message- From: Thierry Legrain Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:36 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: Thierry Legrain Subject: JMX : Questions I have realized a generic MBeanBrowser and I want to test it with TomCat. How to connect MBeanServer with an external program?

FW: dead links ...

2003-01-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
> -- Forwarded Message > From: "Adam Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:29:06 -0800 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: dead links ... > > Hello ... > > I was interested in downloading the newest version of Tomcat and all the links > I tried were dead. Here's where

FW: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken

2003-01-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Nicholas Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken As you may or may not know openprojects.net was bought by freenode.net. Therefore the server address you want has changed to:

FW: documentation error

2003-01-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... FYI... Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Stoffer, Shawn D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:55:11 -0700 > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: documentation error > > I wished to point out that in the jakarta/tomcat documentation, there is

FW: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ?

2002-12-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI, not acked... Can someone look into it? Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:12:14 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ? Hello, I hope you won't mind my email, I'm a bit unsure about whom I s

FW: Broken link, webbaster?

2002-12-19 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI, not acked... -- Forwarded Message From: Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:31:00 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broken link, webbaster? So I'm guessing you know this already, but the link in the top story on jakarta.apache.org ("17 Dec 2002 - Tomcat 4.1.17 S

Re: FW: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-10 Thread Remy Maucherat
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: I'm going to repost this message once again because it seems Remy and Costin didn't bother reading it the first time and are now essentially agreeing to what I suggested below. What-EVER! Lol. Actually, you are proposing releasing multiple binaries because you don't wa

Re: FW: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-10 Thread Costin Manolache
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > I'm going to repost this message once again because it seems Remy and > Costin didn't bother reading it the first time and are now essentially > agreeing to what I suggested below. > > What-EVER! What-EVER to you. Reading your posts is not my favorite activity - for t

FW: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-10 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
I'm going to repost this message once again because it seems Remy and Costin didn't bother reading it the first time and are now essentially agreeing to what I suggested below. What-EVER! -jon -- Forwarded Message From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List"

FW: Apache Tomcat

2002-11-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI > -- Forwarded Message > From: Manjiri Devdhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:23:52 +0530 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Apache Tomcat > > Hello, > > > > This is Manjiri from Wrox Press Ltd taking care of the Open source titles.

FW: R: GOODBYE from tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org

2002-11-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Who unsubbed this guy on Fri Nov 1 03:31:13 PST 2002??? 1036089107 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not a probe, so, someone (one of the moderators, I believe), unsubbed him manually (see at the bottom). Any reason why? Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Luca Ventura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dat

Fw: javadoc on web site

2002-10-18 Thread Warner Onstine
Since noone has responded on the user list, I'm posting this here, hoping someone will put those files back up. -warner - Original Message - From: "Warner Onstine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:32 PM Subject: javadoc on web site > Hi gu

FW: Software caused connection abort

2002-10-02 Thread Jindong Li
This might be the right place for this post? -Original Message- From: Jindong Li Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:15 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Software caused connection abort Hi there, I'm trying out tomcat4.1.12 and noticed that I'm getting exception ra

Fw: [BUG] jk2 jni doesn't work

2002-09-18 Thread Bill Barker
Erm, somehow the reply-to didn't take. - Original Message - From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [BUG] jk2 jni doesn't work > > - Original Message - > From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL P

FW: [NAGOYA.APACHE.ORG] RSYNC Output

2002-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Therewego... Folks, when you change a release from TEST to FINAL, please, don't move files around... Use symlinks, but don't use neither "mv" nor "cp"... Yesterday's promotion of tomcat 4.1.10 from "test" to "release" overkilled the mirrors with a good 43 megabytes of downloads completely useless

FW: Tomcat4 feature set

2002-07-26 Thread Zhenxin Wang
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] he.org] On Behalf Of Zhenxin Wang Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat4 feature set Hi, Besides the obvious .html, servlet, and JSP, what are the other features supported by Tomca

FW: ajp13 (Tomcat 3.2.x) corrupting requests??

2002-07-23 Thread Shinta Tjio
We are using Apache 1.3.26 and Tomcat 3.2.2. We've seen some clients to be hanging Apache on SSL read. The cause of this hang seems to be network/TCP/IP issue. The read will eventually times out. When it times out, here's where the problem starts. Tomcat seems to be grabbing some buffer that cont

FW: Jakarta-tomcat page requires update

2002-07-22 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... Pier -- I love introducing bug: "Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation, Access Violation, this is Floating Point Exception". Eric Prud'Hommeaux -- Forwarded Message From: R Andrew Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:24:29 -0400 (EDT) To:

FW: Tomcat voted "Best Java Application Server"

2002-07-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked -- Forwarded Message > From: "Adams, Lamont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:13:44 -0400 > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat voted "Best Java Application Server" > > Hi there, > > I'm not sure who the best person is to contact about th

FW: bad link

2002-07-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked. -- Forwarded Message > From: "Chanaka Samarajeewa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:45:32 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: bad link > > > Hi, the source download links for tomcat 4.0.3, 4.beta are broken. > > > > _

Re: FW: mod_jk2

2002-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
Quoting Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Fyi... Not acked... Just replied to this gentleman :) Asked to stay tuned and watch announcement on tomcat-dev for mod_jk 1.2.0 and 2.0.0 alpha. Henri > > -- Forwarded Message > From: Mark Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 0

FW: mod_jk2

2002-07-04 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Fyi... Not acked... -- Forwarded Message From: Mark Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:51:24 -0500 (CDT) To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mod_jk2 Hello, The past two days, I have attempted to download mod_jk2 from http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors

FW: [Ethereal-announce] Ethereal 0.9.5 sources and Windows installer released

2002-07-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
ajp support included in latest ethereal ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >Ethereal 0.9.5 has been released. This version

FW: Error in Watchdog JSP in XML tests

2002-06-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI... Dunno who's on watchdog-dev... Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: Kjeld Froberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Trifork Technologies > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:01:12 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Error in Watchdog JSP in XML tests > > Hi > > According to the JSP s

FW: Configuring mod_jk2

2002-06-25 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Contributed documentation for jk2 PS: Note the info that Jetty will also implements ajp13 :) >-Original Message- >From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:24 AM >To: GOMEZ Henri >Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2 > > >Attached is a copy of the notes t

FW: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

2002-06-24 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri thinks we should discuss that here, so I'm forwarding the original mail. Basically I don't like the time. The alternative is to use something like GetTickCount(). The patch uses the semi-dynamic endpoint cache. One should set the high enough worker.cachesize, and the number of opened channe

FW: tomcat 4.0.3

2002-06-14 Thread Moon, Yu-Chan
I apologize, I sent this to the wrong mailing list. > -Original Message- > From: Moon, Yu-Chan > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:46 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: tomcat 4.0.3 > > Dear whomever it may concern, > >I was wondering if anybody could help regard

FW: apt-get rpms ?

2002-06-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hum, it seems apt has been discussed (planned/installed ?) BTW, should we package a commons-logging-1.0.1cvs or stay with commons-logging-1.0 ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP

FW: bad build.xml file.

2002-05-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Rejected posting to general@jakarta, but FYI, easy to fix. Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: Ryan Christianson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:31:12 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: bad build.xml file. > > Just a friendly note. > > If you install tomcat 4.01, a

Re: FW: cvs commit: jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/project jakarta-tomcat-40.xmljakarta-tomcat-connectors.xml jakarta-tomcat-jasper.xml jak arta-tomcat.xml

2002-04-13 Thread Sam Ruby
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > We need some changes in 3.3 build and gump descriptor, Sam suggest we > shouldn't put anything outside of our own build and dist subdirs.. Any > ideas what happens now with GUMP? the actual error seems weird.. The relevant lines in http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gum

  1   2   3   4   >