Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-06 Thread Eric Rescorla
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The way it works - the connector ( or protocol handler ) creates the > > socket, using plain, jsse, pureTLS. And Remy is saying that some othe > > valves are calling getSocket() and use the socket/JSSE to extract info ( > > I assume using JSSE spec

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
> On 5 Apr 2002, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > I have big doubts the code that calls getSocket() can even work with ajp > > > > or pureTLS or other things. Probably a good idea to find where it is a

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-06 Thread costinm
On 5 Apr 2002, Eric Rescorla wrote: > "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > I have big doubts the code that calls getSocket() can even work with ajp > > > or pureTLS or other things. Probably a good idea to find where it is and > > > ca

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread Eric Rescorla
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > I have big doubts the code that calls getSocket() can even work with ajp > > or pureTLS or other things. Probably a good idea to find where it is and > > call the right thing ( like getAttribute for cert

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Some valves in the Catalina pipeline use that. > > > > It probably should be done at the protocol layer, but I can't do that for > > compatibility reasons, so I think the socket should be set as a note in the > > Request object (as is suggested in

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread costinm
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Some valves in the Catalina pipeline use that. > > It probably should be done at the protocol layer, but I can't do that for > compatibility reasons, so I think the socket should be set as a note in the > Request object (as is suggested in the commente

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
> 2 questions ( for Remy ): > > - is anyone using the getSocket() method in CoyoteRequest ? It's obvious > this can't work for other protocols, and extracting SSL info is > specific to the SSL impl and should be done at the protocol layer. Some valves in the Catalina pipeline use that. It probab

CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread costinm
2 questions ( for Remy ): - is anyone using the getSocket() method in CoyoteRequest ? It's obvious this can't work for other protocols, and extracting SSL info is specific to the SSL impl and should be done at the protocol layer. - Any reason for not extending HttpBaseRequest ? Costin -- T