jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
It would be easy to add an in-memory Java connector using the Coyote
API, which could be used for embedding in IDEs or other embedded
environments. This avoids the overhead of network I/O
Remy Maucherat wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
It would be easy to add an in-memory Java connector using the Coyote
API, which could be used for embedding in IDEs or other embedded
environments. This avoids the overhead of network I/O and additional
bloat create
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
It would be easy to add an in-memory Java connector using the Coyote
API, which could be used for embedding in IDEs or other embedded
environments. This avoids the overhead of network I/O and additional
bloat created by having a HTTP clien
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
It would be easy to add an in-memory Java connector using the Coyote
API, which could be used for embedding in IDEs or other embedded
environments. This avoids the overhead of network I/O and additional
bloat created by having a HTTP client/server in such an environme
Hi,
It would be easy to add an in-memory Java connector using the Coyote
API, which could be used for embedding in IDEs or other embedded
environments. This avoids the overhead of network I/O and additional
bloat created by having a HTTP client/server in such an environment.
Comments ?
Remy