Thanks Remy,
This is really great news.
>>What is the feeling nearly three months on? Are we still aiming at full
>>separation in terms both of dependancy and Jar? Are these five fixable?
>>
>
>No. Just package your JARs differently.
>cluster, deploy and net are self-contained packages, so jus
> Folks,
>
> Back in a thread that ended on the 16th October we talked of some fixes
> to the code that makes the interface abstractions ( interfaces & classes
> in org.apache.catalina package ) no longer dependant on implementation
> of Catalina.
>
> The reason we needed this is that it will make
Tom, Folks,
Thanks for that. I can't comment really either as I am not a committer.
Bip's last revision to Cluster is from July.
I think there are a couple more classes in org.apache.catalina.startup
that should have interfaces extracted from them and placed in
org.apache.catalina. These a
e does not 'work' and has
some design issues that must be addressed before it can be made to work.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 4:12 PM
Subject: Catalina interface
Folks,
Back in a thread that ended on the 16th October we talked of some fixes
to the code that makes the interface abstractions ( interfaces & classes
in org.apache.catalina package ) no longer dependant on implementation
of Catalina.
The reason we needed this is that it will make Catalina m
