On Wednesday 05 September 2001 09:57, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 September 2001 04:13, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >
> > If you don't remove the --disable-shared, then libtool 1.4 can't compile
> > mod_webapp as a dynamic library.
>
> I just want a DSO file
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 05 September 2001 04:13, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> If you don't remove the --disable-shared, then libtool 1.4 can't compile
> mod_webapp as a dynamic library.
I just want a DSO file...
- On my Linux if I remove the --disable-shared to the APR, libtool co
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 04:13, jean-frederic clere wrote:
If you don't remove the --disable-shared, then libtool 1.4 can't compile
mod_webapp as a dynamic library. It really sucks, but complain to the
libtool developers. That flg must go, or we break anybody who tries to use
the latest
Hi,
I have committed it. Note that the --disable-shared MUST NOT be removed
otherwise libtool uses the dynamic libraries and we want it to use the static
ones.
Cheers
Jean-frederic
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> > > > LOCAL_HEADER([Configuring APR])
> > > > LOCAL_FILTEREXEC(
> > > > - [./configure --
> > > LOCAL_HEADER([Configuring APR])
> > > LOCAL_FILTEREXEC(
> > > - [./configure --enable-static --disable-shared --disable-threads],
> > > + [./configure --enable-static --disable-threads],
> > > ["APR configure"])
> > > if ${TEST} "${ret}" -ne "0"
> > > then
> >
> > Hmm... I'd like to rely
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hmm... I'd like to rely on the APR code coming with Apache 2.0 instead of
>> building our local copy with Apache 2.0... (I'll see what I can figure out,
>> hoping that 2.0 works on my OS/X box :)
>
> Oh, if that's what you want to do, I can make that
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:36, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > +TARGET="${SRCDIR}/apache-2.0"
> > +makefile="apache-2.0/Makefile"
> > +AC_MSG_RESULT([setting target module to... ${TARGET}])
> > + ]
> > +)
> > +AC_SUBST(TARGET)
> > +
> > +dnl
>
> Wasn't APXS for 2.0 completely broken? That'
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody, I'm new to the list, but for anybody who doesn't know me,
> I have been pretty active on httpd 2.0.
DOH! :) Hi Ryan :)
> I decided to port mod_webapp last week, and Pier committed the code for me,
> but the build system isn't there, so
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thursday 30 August 2001 01:10, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> > Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > Hi everybody, I'm new to the list, but for anybody who doesn't know me,
> > > I have been pretty active on httpd 2.0. I decided to port mod_webapp
> > > last week, and Pier committed t
On Thursday 30 August 2001 01:10, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Hi everybody, I'm new to the list, but for anybody who doesn't know me,
> > I have been pretty active on httpd 2.0. I decided to port mod_webapp
> > last week, and Pier committed the code for me, but the build s
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> Hi everybody, I'm new to the list, but for anybody who doesn't know me,
> I have been pretty active on httpd 2.0. I decided to port mod_webapp last
> week, and Pier committed the code for me, but the build system isn't there, so
> I am posting the build system now.
>
> Th
Hi everybody, I'm new to the list, but for anybody who doesn't know me,
I have been pretty active on httpd 2.0. I decided to port mod_webapp last
week, and Pier committed the code for me, but the build system isn't there, so
I am posting the build system now.
This is currently working, althoug
12 matches
Mail list logo
