RE: Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0

On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 18:12, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > I'll build rpm for Apache 2.0.35 and see if I've > got the same problem Thanks! Bojan PS. BTW, this was on RedHat, so it'll be the proper test. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0

-Original Message- >From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 7:14 AM >To: Tomcat Dev List >Subject: Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0 > > >I'm playing with Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0 (from CVS) and I've >encountered so

Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0

I'm playing with Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0 (from CVS) and I've encountered some weird behaviour in regards to DirectoryIndex directive of Apache. It seems that all *.jsp/*.vm (and whatever other extensions are mapped to Tomcat through mod_jk) have stopped working as default i