Gomez Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Frankly, Apache (HTTPd) went on for ages without installers, and it
>> just went great... I don't see the need for it.
>
> On Unixes world Apache is easy to build and install but it's not so
> easy under Windows Boxes. More Windows users want to have su
> Why the heck does it matter what installer software that we use?
As usually Jon, you only see what you want in the thread.
JF proposed to use a JAVA OpenSource Installer, something you
should understand and be agree with it to install java software
on many platforms
> As long as people ca
> Frankly, Apache (HTTPd) went on for ages without installers, and it
> just went great... I don't see the need for it.
On Unixes world Apache is easy to build and install but it's not so
easy under Windows Boxes. More Windows users want to have such installer
stuff and if you want to see Windows
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> A Java installer is what we need, OpenSource one of course.
>> Installing a Java product should not be too related to the platform on
> which it
>> is installed, installing is just copying the right files at the right
> place.
>> (well may a little more
Why the heck does it matter what installer software that we use?
As long as people can easily modify it without having to purchase expensive
software and that it does the job well, all that matters is that someone is
doing the work to create the installer. I don't care if it is Java based or
not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of jean-frederic clere
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alternative to NSI
Klaus Sonnenleiter wrote:
>
> I've worked with both Setup Factory and InstallSh
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Veen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alternative to NSI
The Windows installer I like most is InnoSetup
(www.innosetup.org). It's free, but not MSI based.
Rolf.
jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Klaus Sonnenleiter wrote:
>>
>> I've worked with both Setup Factory and InstallShield in the past and I liked
>> Setup Factory a lot. But as far as I know, it is Windows only. Last I heard,
>> both InstallShield and Wise were planning Java versio
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> > >A Java installer is what we need, OpenSource one of course.
> > >Installing a Java product should not be too related to the platform on
> > which it
> > >is installed, installing is just copying the right files at the right
> > place.
> > >(well may a little more ;-)).
>
> >A Java installer is what we need, OpenSource one of course.
> >Installing a Java product should not be too related to the platform on
> which it
> >is installed, installing is just copying the right files at the right
> place.
> >(well may a little more ;-)).
> >Does someone knows about such a
> >A Java installer is what we need, OpenSource one of course.
> >Installing a Java product should not be too related to the platform on
> which it
> >is installed, installing is just copying the right files at the right
> place.
> >(well may a little more ;-)).
> >Does someone knows about such a
>A Java installer is what we need, OpenSource one of course.
>Installing a Java product should not be too related to the platform on
which it
>is installed, installing is just copying the right files at the right
place.
>(well may a little more ;-)).
>Does someone knows about such a tool?
It seem
Remy Maucherat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I had a tweaked version of the script, but unfortunately my main HD died on me
> a few moments ago. The tweaks weren't too complex so I should be able to put
> them back in quickly.
> What would I do without IMAP (thanks Pier ;-)) and CVS ? (since of
ECTED]
> >
> >
> > -----
> >
> > From: Remy Maucherat
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Alternative to NSI
> > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 2
The Windows installer I like most is InnoSetup
(www.innosetup.org). It's free, but not MSI based.
Rolf.
x in advance,
Hiten Pandya
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
From: Remy Maucherat
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alternative to NSI
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 22:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:
ay, July 15, 2001 1:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Alternative to NSI
>
>
> Quoting Daniel Ritchey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Microsoft has its own installation mechanism built in to Win2000 & WinXP
> > and
> > offers a download to add it
AIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alternative to NSI
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 22:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [64.208.42.41] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBD1A7B2200CA4004311F40D02A290A770; Sat, 14 Jul 200
Quoting Daniel Ritchey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Microsoft has its own installation mechanism built in to Win2000 & WinXP
> and
> offers a download to add it Win9x. Its the same thing that the binary
> release of Apache for windows is packaged in.
>
> Just thought I would throw that out there, I
Microsoft has its own installation mechanism built in to Win2000 & WinXP and
offers a download to add it Win9x. Its the same thing that the binary
release of Apache for windows is packaged in.
Just thought I would throw that out there, I don't know if it has any
advantages over NSI.
20 matches
Mail list logo
