Re: 3.2 Branch Release Management

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >At least until someone else comes along and wants to do a > >better job at it :-). > > May be you'll need to find someone to do that job to help > you be more on 4.0 ? Someone as proposed to do that some time ago. > Yep -- 4.0 would progress faster (and I would get more sle

RE: 3.2 Branch Release Management

à changer >de défauts." >> -- Voltaire >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Dan Milstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 11:44 PM >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: 3.2 Branch Release Man

Re: 3.2 Branch Release Management

hem? Craig > > "Pour la plupart des hommes, se corriger consiste à changer de défauts." > -- Voltaire > > >-Original Message- > >From: Dan Milstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 11:44 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3.2 Branch Release Management

Craig is the Release Manager of 3.2 :-) "Pour la plupart des hommes, se corriger consiste à changer de défauts." -- Voltaire >-Original Message- >From: Dan Milstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 11:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Su

3.2 Branch Release Management

Does anyone have any opinions on a process for making commits to the 3.2 branch? Now that I've got my new fancy committer status, I'd like to check in some bug fixes there (to mod_jk / ajp13). However, before I do that, I wanted to check if there is anyone who is functioning as a Release Mana