Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:43 AM Subject: Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo. > > > > Committed for apache1, apache2 and iis. > What we'll need

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:51 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>What we'll need eventually is the same for jk/native/jni > >Same, but load offset 6A6E for example (leaving 192k of pages >for mod_jk) since it must be loaded into the same process. See my >native2 jni project. And the attached patch. Hap

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:49 AM 12/23/2004, Jerome Jar wrote: >Oo, that's very nice of you:) I'll try it as soon as the download >finished... Note that diagnosing /O2 files can get tricky (on win32 or on any un*x build, of course.) Hope you enjoy, happy holidays :) At 07:43 AM 12/23/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: >Willi

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread Jerome Jar
Oo, that's very nice of you:) I'll try it as soon as the download finished... On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 02:18:13 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch has minimal impact but a ton of benefits... > > The patch [for jk and jk2, not that it matters as much] allows > anyone t

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Oh no! The beauty is, is you can distribute them separately for anyone who actually cares. For everyone who doesn't, the .dll file is entirely identical to the one we used to build. In the Win32 httpd world, we have an optional -symbols.zip file with such .dsp files fo

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:32 AM 12/23/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>This patch has minimal impact but a ton of benefits... > >So, it's the /Zi for PDB's and /base:address? >Does it mean that we'll need to distribute the pdb files >together with .dll's? Oh no! The beauty is, is you can distr

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: This patch has minimal impact but a ton of benefits... So, it's the /Zi for PDB's and /base:address? Does it mean that we'll need to distribute the pdb files together with .dll's? The patch [for jk and jk2, not that it matters as much] OK for JK, but -1 on JK2. We agreed

[patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
This patch has minimal impact but a ton of benefits... The patch [for jk and jk2, not that it matters as much] allows anyone to debug and diagnose stack dumps using windbg or any other debugging tool, and (if they add the .pdb files to their installation) to make sense of dr watson logs. It split