Re: [j-t-c] JNI support

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >Well I use HAVE_JNI for these things. There is no need to > >create an empty unit > >in jk_jni_worker.c that a work for configure. I will remove > >the file from the > >file list. (via a conditional include jni.mk) > > Superb. I have committed the needed changes. Cheers

RE: [j-t-c] JNI support

>Well I use HAVE_JNI for these things. There is no need to >create an empty unit >in jk_jni_worker.c that a work for configure. I will remove >the file from the >file list. (via a conditional include jni.mk) Superb.

Re: [j-t-c] JNI support

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Find attached a patch to make jni support facultative : > > If you define USE_NO_JNI (by hand in Makefile or via > updated autoconf), the JNI support is removed. > > Thanks to comments > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .

[j-t-c] JNI support

Find attached a patch to make jni support facultative : If you define USE_NO_JNI (by hand in Makefile or via updated autoconf), the JNI support is removed. Thanks to comments - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECE