>
>Jean-frederic wrote :
>
>Well, if in 10 years I have to do some maintenance at a
>customer it would be
>nice to have the sources with the running system. But I am not
>sure that a
>customer will also have the source of his applications...
That's all the power of packaging method like RPM,
s
The *only* reason I brought this up in the first place was because I thought
it was an oversight in the build process. "The *source* in the *bin* build
I downloaded doesn't seem right..." - what the good Mr. Cain had previously
stated. If it WAS just a mere oversight, we can shave some time and
Quoting Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [ ] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process, meaning do
> the
> > job]
> > [ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
> > [ ] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this is not
> > binding]
> > [X] - -1 Are you n
Loïc Lefèvre at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think you don't read ALL the mails you receive, if you look carfully,
> you'll see I wanted to keep the sources in the package...
> The answer I give here is IRONIC ;)
Oh :) Sorry :) My bad this time :) :) :) Yeah, I don't read ALL emails,
especially
[X] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process, meaning do the job]
[ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
[ ] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this is not binding]
[ ] - -1 Are you nuts? Sources are there and there have to remain.
Comments: (required f
It's YOUR point of view... not mine, sorry :(
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : vendredi 3 août 2001 12:02
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Sources in Binary Distributions
>
>
> Loïc
Loïc Lefèvre at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [X] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process, meaning do the job]
> [ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
> [ ] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this is not binding]
> [ ] - -1 Are you nuts? Sources are ther
[ ] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process, meaning do the job]
[ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
[X] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this is not binding]
[ ] - -1 Are you nuts? Sources are there and there have to remain.
Well, if in 10 years
> -Original Message-
> From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> [...]
>
> [X] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process,
> meaning do the job]
> [ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
> [ ] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this
Paul Speed at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As another example, I've never tried to compile the JDK .java sources,
> but I always have at least a few of the files loaded into my editor at
> any given time.
That's a nice point :) I check out the JDK sources at least 3 times/day...
But never built
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [ ] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process, meaning do the job]
> [ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
> [X] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this is not binding]
> [ ] - -1 Are you nuts? Sources a
Paul Speed at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Everyone who? jakarta/apache? I would agree with that.
Since I've been on the ASF, all project I saw always included SRCs in BINs
(now, someone of us might not do it, but that's not a project I use, then).
Discussion pointless... Clogging my inbox whe
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > [ ] - +1 Remove the sources [I will help in the process, meaning do the job]
> > [ ] - +0 Remove the sources [I can't help, won't help]
> > [X] - -0 Leave the sources [But since I don't volunteer this is not bind
13 matches
Mail list logo
