> > I can live with any but the first. It would be nice to have it as a
> config
> > option however. JkOptions is probably fine for 1.2. Not sure where it
> > should be set in Jk2.
>
> Thanks. I'm not sure about mod_jk2 either. The latest reports show that
> the code still doesn't work.
Great
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 23:39, Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone
> > thinks. So, here are the choices:
> >
> > [ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat
> > [ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned
> Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone
> thinks. So, here are the choices:
>
> [ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat
> [ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned on/off
> [ ] Remove DIR_MAGIC_TYPE handling altogether
> [ ]
And I answer (to myself :-)
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> So, the unsolved questions for me are:
>
> 1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the
> request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is included in the test? It must be that its mapping
> is 'better' t
